clearly appropriate and said, clear and impermissible hostility toward sincerely held religious beliefs. rob: as carly said, a very narrow link, this cannot be applied very broadly. here is some of the ruling from the supreme court, from the majority, these disputes must be resolved with tolerance, without undue disrespect to sincere religious beliefs and without subjecting gay persons to indignities when they seek services in an open market. this ruling doesn t really apply to this statement because they did say in the future we have to look this way but how do you do that? how do you satisfy both sides? reporter: you are right that the court did cite that and that is the beauty of justice kennedy s practical uage, she offered the same-sex marriage decision as well saying absolutely the lgbt community should not suffer or be subjected to indignities in the open market but neither should
shannon: in one of the remaining blockbuster cases facing the supreme court this term, the justices handed a christian baker a win by a 7-2 margin after he declined to make a custom cake for a gay couple t it has left some unanswered questions. the legal team for colorado baker jack phillips is celebrating today. after a seven i could do supreme court opinion, holding that phillips never got a fair shake when he was sued by the gay couple after declining to create a cake. writing for the majority, justice kennedy noted that at least one of the colorado commissioners who are the original complaint like into phillips explanation and
treatment will continue. they will continue their fight and you say both sides are celebrating this as a victory. why is that? reporter: the aclu released a statement elevating the saying the court did affirm there is no place for discrimination in the context of the lgbt community in the open market and they cited the fact this had to do with the hostility of the state against religious beliefs. both of these parties walked away feelinghey were vindicated even though the baker was the ultimate victor in this case so it will remain to be seen how the lower courts react and how supreme court reacts should the lower cases be granted tertiary before the court yet again. rob: it will be a pickle going forward how to deal with it. appreciate it. jack phillips, the baker this morning on fox and friends coming up in the 8:00 hour, stay
being met with a list of demands frohe democrats. if he tries to reach a deal with kim jong un just for the sake of reaching a deal, then he will have invested at the negotiating table yet again. in one of the remaining blockbuster cases facing the supreme court this term, the justices hand a christian baker a win 7-2 margin after he declined to make a custom cake for a gay couple. bill clinton says he doesn t owe monica lewenski an apology. i apologized to everybody in the world. you didn t apologize to her. did i not talk tore h i did say on more than one occasion i was sorry. steve: the message from the president is if youon t want to stand for the national anthem, you are not invited. r-o-c-k in the u.s.a. r-o-c-k in the u.s.a. r-o-c-k in the u.s.a. steve: rocking at the white house at the white house.
sincerely held religious beliefs be subject to open hostility on the part of the state. the court did not provide guidance on how lower courts should balance the interests. you are right this is a narrow runly applied to the hostility suffered here on the part of the baker and not the larger question whether sincerely held religious beliefs can legally prevent a business from doing business with a member of the lgbt community. if this case were to arise again the outcome, we don t know what that would be, the larger question, the state cannot act with hostility in its assessment of the larger question. carly: the headline is there are so many unanswered questions and if this baker or somebody else where to refuse serv based on their religious beliefs they could get sued again. the same-sex couple responded to the court s ruling, the decision means our fight against discrimination and unfair