Warrants . The concern grows out of the fact that all of the failures and the and The Information that shouldved been given and wasnt given. And the question being what was the intent . What what washa their intention . Their motivation there. And what we determined was we couldnt definitively say what the motivation was. Are these pretty smart people . Fairly welleducated . At least welleducated. I dont know if theyre smart. I dont know if were very smart to beow honest with you. I was b going to say they have law degrees, right . At least somehe of them do. So you think the woods review for people at this level of the organization. To be clear, the stuff that didnt happen on the woods review was basic stuff. Yeah. You didnt need to be a deeplyexperienced fbi agent to be able to do it the right way. Well, thats my point. So wouldnt you think that would almost be muscle p memory for people who are going through this process to know they had an obligation to go through that . They clear
that would have to come from the fbi orld the department. okay. so with that, how many how many case agents involved with the fisa applications in your report are still active case agents today? as i sit here, i can t tell you the precise number. there are several who still are. that are active. that are still active agents. whether they re still in certain roles or not, i don t know. okay. because you don t know specifically if they are still working as casely agents, do yo believe, if they were working as case agents, that the information contained in your report as it relates to those case agents should be released to other criminal defendants under the department s policy? i think this raises those kinds of issuesnk for the department to review and consider what they have to do to remedy any wrongs here. and for those folks that are