i have had my and commenting certainly on the defendant s right to silence. but doesn t make a difference today. he overtried it, over charged it. had i been the d.a. in this case, and remember, they re charging off the table. they re not charging off of live testimony. i would have charged three counts, this is a straight up homicide count, two counts of first-degree, one count of attempted first-degree, recognizing you re in for the fight of your life on self-defense. i credit the jury for standing firm, and i think all of us under read, i did, how smart this jury was and how focused they were on the jury instructions. complicated case. the verdict is the verdict. the government has to accept it. i lost a major case, and just have to admit that the jury works and thank you very much. and move on. but kyle rittenhouse is not a hero. he s not a vigilante, and he s not white supremacy, and anybody who looks at this case x walks away and says this is a signal that i can go to these mas
not crew -yard line, but there s ukraine, but there s articles suggesting ukrainian officials met with democratic operatives in 2016. i don t know if that s true. here s what i m going to do with trump, get it over as quickly as possible, listen to what the house case let them present their case x. if there s nothing new and dramatic, i would be ready to vote, and we can do all this other stuff in congressional oversight. maria: so are you saying you re not going to have people come down i am saying that i m going to end this as quickly as i can for the good of the country. when 51 of us say we ve heard enough, the trial is going to end. the president s going to be acquitted. you may want to call schiff, you may want to call hunter biden, he may want to call joe biden, but here s my advice to the president: if the senate is ready to vote and acquit you, you should celebrate that, and we can look at this other stuff outside of impeachment. impeachment is tearing the country apar
himself or contradicting himself. so the question is where he comes down on this, and i don t think anybody in washington knows. chris: we asked you for questions for the panel, and we got this on twitter from peter. a political party is using trumped the-up reasons to remove a potus, president, they don t like. what will be the long-term impact on the nation, and could this process repeat itself often? marie, how do you answer peter, and how do you answer the argument that some people are making, that jonah at least raised, that maybe the president is really bad judgment here, but this doesn t rise to the level of overturning an electionsome. democrats will have to make the argument for why it does x that s why getting all of this information out publicly in these hearings is so important. this week we will shift to people that were part of this irregular channel of policy including gordon sondland, but they will have to make the case x that s what we will see them
himself or contradicting himself. so the question is where he comes down on this, and i don t think anybody in washington knows. chris: we asked you for questions for the panel, and we got this on twitter from peter. a political party is using trumped the-up reasons to remove a potus, president, they don t like. what will be the long-term impact on the nation, and could this process repeat itself often? marie, how do you answer peter, and how do you answer the argument that some people are making, that jonah at least raised, that maybe the president is really bad judgment here, but this doesn t rise to the level of overturning an electionsome. democrats will have to make the argument for why it does x that s why getting all of this information out publicly in these hearings is so important. this week we will shift to people that were part of this irregular channel of policy including gordon sondland, but they will have to make the case x that s what we will see them
himself or contradicting himself. so the question is where he comes down on this, and i don t think anybody in washington knows. chris: we asked you for questions for the panel, and we got this on twitter from peter. a political party is using trumped the-up reasons to remove a potus, president, they don t like. what will be the long-term impact on the nation, and could this process repeat itself often? marie, how do you answer peter, and how do you answer the argument that some people are making, that jonah at least raised, that maybe the president is really bad judgment here, but this doesn t rise to the level of overturning an electionsome. democrats will have to make the argument for why it does x that s why getting all of this information out publicly in these hearings is so important. this week we will shift to people that were part of this irregular channel of policy including gordon sondland, but they will have to make the case x that s what we will see them