administrative law court to determine that these products should be banned, removed from shelves and they sued the company overnight. how did this make you sneel there have been reports of kids swallowing detergent, laundry detergent pods. those haven t been completely banned. the business owners haven t been sued for $57 million like you are. sure. yeah. no. not just that, the rate of incident with those products is actually far less than that, of bucky balls. so i think when you start to look at it, there certainly was an element of selective enforcement and the fact that an individual was named in this case points to potentially more than selective enforcement. this doesn t seem fair. you take the risk just like every small business owner does in america, and then the government puts a target on your back essentially is the way you say you feel. what can we all learn from this and what action are you taking?
he needs to do it now. tonight need to overload problematic immigration system. alisyn: congressman, how does this case illustrate porous border? the guys came in when they were eight years old and 15 years old. how would you change kids or teenagers coming in, seeking asylum from a war-torn country? wouldn t we still welcome people like that who want to get out of that situation? wouldn t we open them with open arms? yeah. this doesn t specifically point out a problem with the porous border. this points out the problem with the ingration system. where you had immigration system where you had people before they were made the legalized citizen, one made a citizen, september 11 last year. before that, they were radicalized and we didn t have the wherewithal to make sure that we were not legalizing people that were going to hurt us. that is what this case points out.
over to the house. they re staying late. many of them are canceling plans to be back in their districts to accommodate this and then it would go to the president. it was not expected to be this kind of a cliff-hanger 11th hour drama, but the rights of someone like senator rand paul, who can make these case points and say that we need to take a little time with this, that has sort of gummed up the works. but it has been an untwisting battle behind the scenes to come to some resolution and the intelligence community has said they don t want to see this expire because they don t want any interruption in their ability to do the surveillance to try to track terrorists, that sort of thing. so it s been one of those moment by moment dramas we think will be a vote later this afternoon. and people are still talking about the senate vote, of course, on congressman paul ryan s budget. went down, i believe the vote was 40-57 with five senate republicans voting against it. we also know the presid
time, but i also understood that because i was a child that he was he re-offended. he was released and he violated another victim, and i had another limitation that i could have taken advantage of because of his incarceration, but because the case was cold and they had no i don t know, there s no excuse, but this is what i was told because the case was cold they didn t have the opportunity to try and nail this guy at that time. and there is no excuse. lisa, this is where you step in as attorney general. this must be so frustrating to hear not only about lavenia s case, but all of the other cases that are out there and all of the rape test kits that have been sitting on these shelves because these guys are roaming the streets still. they re roaming the streets and rapists sex offenders in general tend to be repeat offenders and as miss masters case points out, this is a