There are prevailing misconceptions among young lawyers and even among the many experienced practitioners pertaining to Caveat. The existing misconception regarding Caveat is the thinking that the.
he was pleading to something that was the case. and not something that he s finding out part of the agreement. she s doing it to protect him making sure he understood it and it was constitutional. boris. care remark you mentioned that both sides, the prosecution and hunter biden s legal team have 30 days to file the briefs. have we heard what that process is going to be like? has either side given an indication what they intend to do with those briefings? reporter: well, the prosecution said that they would need time to review the transcript because there was so much discussed today, to make sure that they understood exactly what issues the judge had questions about. they would need time to do legal briefings on the issue. to look for case laws to basically support their position but also, you know, to negotiate probably further and firm up some of these questions they were modifying on the fly, such as the scope of the immunity deal, you know, within the tax
difficult. they could hand some sort of tool to the defense. i m just curious your thoughts on that. well, i mean, the sixth amendment provides that the criminal criminal case is entitled to a jury from the state and the district at which the alleged crime was committed. that is the bottom principle. now, how that is applied depends on a particular facts of the case. you, know of a particular case, we don t know all the facts here. but we know a lot of the facts, a lot of the things that were bad occurred in florida, although some of the bad things were directed at an investigation that was being conducted from washington. there is not just because the constitution has clear words on it does not mean that the case laws are necessarily that clear, as the applies to specific statutes and specific factual scenarios. as i understand it, the law is not necessarily uniform for district by district. so, they will try to minimize the risk of having an indictment bounced by bringing, you kn
district at which the alleged crime was committed. that is the bottom principle. now, how that is applied depends on a particular facts of the case. you, know of a particular case, we don t know all the facts here. but we know a lot of the facts, a lot of the things that were bad occurred in florida, although some of the bad things were directed at an investigation that was being conducted from washington. there is not just because the constitution has clear words on it does not mean that the case laws are necessarily that clear, as the applies to specific statutes and specific factual scenarios. as i understand it, the law is not necessarily uniform for district by district. so, they will try to minimize the risk of having an indictment bounced by bringing, you know, taking the best shot where they think they re most likely is to stay. and given the amount of activity that went on in florida, bad activity, it s not surprising that they have a grand jury going on. yeah, well said. ge