that is the kind of trumpian lie that we did not expect from donald trump s criminal defense lawyers, the ones who haven t quit over any. the criminal defense lawyers who signed this filing on have all signed their names to a lie. on page six, donald trump s criminal defense lawyers tell a purely trumpian lie in their own words. completely of their own volition. they change the phrasing they used on page one of their filing, about this case being, quote, a prosecution advanced by the administration of a sitting president against his chief political rival. they changed that to calling this case, quote, the prosecution of a leading presidential candidates by his
true. donald trump and his speech writers, later in the same speech, said, i will appoint a real special prosecutor to go after the most corrupt president in the history of the united states of america. donald trump promised to do exactly what he falsely accused joe biden of doing. that is the kind of trumpian lie that we did not expect from donald trump s criminal defense lawyers, the ones who haven t quit over any. the criminal defense lawyers who signed this filing on have all signed their names to a lie. on page six, donald trump s criminal defense lawyers tell a purely trumpian lie in their own words. completely of their own volition. they change the phrasing they used on page one of their filing, about this case being, quote, a prosecution advanced by the administration of a sitting president against his
counts or 34 counts, very likely given new york law and given new york practice be a fine. a probationary sentence, a fine, a non-jail sentence. the stakes here in this new federal case are way higher for that reason. let s slow our role on this conviction and sentencing, let s talk about the trial, the ghost trial, which i m sure it will. let s talk about miami vice d.c. miami is a game changer, i think, vice this case being in d.c. for a couple of reasons. one is the jury pool is extremely different than d.c. it s a much more dynamic jury pool skand you have a jury pool that you have a lot of groups, some groups in south ask central america, cubans, dominicans, venezuelans, colombians, initially a lot of people in those jury pools have this adverse reaction to federal type of law enforcement, just because of where they were raised and their background. also, in terms of the diversity with the southern district, i think the defense attorneys here have a real shot at maybe a
the fbi. and now this investigation. ainsley: now the a.g. and the fbi director. they had to have signed off on this. and i know that you are the former acting attorney general under donald trump. what do you know about that? would they have had to say yes, you can go and do this? go and search his house rather than do the subpoena? well, there is two different things that could have happened. they could have, you know, had this working part of the investigation and gone to them late and said this is going to happen tomorrow, that, you know, what happened in the case when i was acting attorney general roger stone given late notice, wasn t told about the specifics of the tactics or techniques that were going to be used. but, you know, in this case, i m guessing that both chris wray and merrick garland were intimately involved and not only approving this case being, you know, progressing as it did, but also approving the execution of a search warrant instead of other means to obtain
2020, since we were last allowed in there to watch all of the justices argue or watch a case being argued. and the dynamic, when they could jump in at any point as opposed to going one by one in order of seniority, is so much more effective and surfaces the weaknesses and the strengths of a case. so it was quite exciting and it went very seamlessly. justice kavanaugh was participating remote because he has been infected with covid. but he was able to get his questions in without any problem. so it was a very dynamic situation there. but as much as it was seamless for the arguments themselves, it was essentially a warm-up for exactly what you re talking about here. we re going to have a very big second amendment gun rights case argued in november. that will test whether the second amendment right to bear arms that the supreme court said covers a weapon in the home for