students will learn more of the history. what do you see as the longer term impact of all of this on the next generation? right. it s ridiculous. how is it more robust? help us understand what that might mean. robust in terms of when? more rigorous in its approach? no, it s not. it is distorted. it is taking u.s. history, in this case african american contributions to history, and not just history but culture, politics, sociology and the like. it is taking the experiences of marginalized peoples and putting them on the chopping block of a ideology and a politics that is destructive. what impact will it have? it will deny young students access to rigorous history. to robust history, to an accounting of america for what it has done in the past that has been glorious and has been grievous. the point of history is for us to learn from that past in order to apply lessons to the present.
Дело афроамериканца Джорджа Флойда не стало уроком для Европы euronews.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from euronews.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
representing in this case african-american? you know we shouldn t make any assumptions about race or gender. and we re not revealing who the grand juror is for that person s own prex legal prex at this point. just to get it technically correct, tony at this point, is there any legal restriction on you or on your client on revealing just the name and identification and identifying characteristics about the grand juror? well this grand juror is concerned, and is afraid of coming forward without the ability to speak. i understand that. but i m asking about actual legal process in missouri. is there anything that makes it impossible for a grand juror to reveal the simple declarative sentence, i was a grand juror on that case? we think that if you read the law strictly that that would be illegal, just revealing that you were a member of the grand jury.
not allow this grand juror to come in and tell their tale. is the grand juror you re representing in this case african-american? you know, we shouldn t make any assumptions about race or gender. and we re not revealing who the grand juror is, for that person s own protection, legal protection at this point. just to get it technically correct, tony at this point, is there any legal restriction on you or on your client on revealing just the name and identification and identifying characteristics about the grand juror? well, this grand juror is concerned, and is afraid of coming forward without the ability to speak. i understand that. but i m asking about actual legal process in missouri. is there anything that makes it impossible for a grand juror to reveal the simple declarative sentence, i was a grand juror on that case? we think that if you read the law strictly that that would be illegal, just revealing that you