questions and concerns, by the time we had this conversation, they were relaxed with a big smile on their face. everybody else we talked to were very happy that they came door to door, and they were interested in learning about it. it showed me some of the people were neutral, but a lot of people were really very pleased by the time the staff and i left. i realize that there are many more people besides me and a few others and that is not just the tenants who are opposed, but many who are for it. i have this year, and i will pass this out a synopsis of 9% supervisor mar: thank you. next, please. thank you so much supervisors. i am helaniting. i am part of the action combs. we want to say we are opposed to this development. we know it will not be any good, especially to all of us long-term people there. as far as trying to speak to other people that want to tear down park merced, they are brand new people there, hardly been there at all. no, i think if park merced want
mr. ruston. yes, my name is michael ruston. i am a resident of 16 years. i would like to recommend that you deny the motion to approve these rezonings, et cetera. i think it s a violation of due process, that the recommendations of katherine moore have not been considered. there was no consideration of a non-demolition scheme for improving park merced. i would like to point out, i understand you aring looking for fair treatment on densification in the city, but to say we need to do more development on the west is questionable at best, you need to look at development that does not bulldoze people s hirms. you did it when the highway came down and new territory opened up that didn t destroy people s home. i would like you to consider there are many dogs that play and use this open space, and that there are people as well. i really would like to ask you look at who is behind the promises. i went on google and looked at stellar management and fortress previous developments. th
residents, the project is preferable to the chaotic third element that represents uncontrolled density growth on the west side. you have a clear look at what can be done with planned growth whether you like it or not. and you have a clear look in the future about the disaster that is coming with turning housing into density zoning. the west side needs planned intelligent growth. thank you. hello, board of supervisors. my name is carroll coppell. i have lived at park merced for 21 years in a two-bedroom garden apartment. i support them. i have spoken many times here at the hearing about the dilapidated apartment, and i want to take this team to speak from my heart. i don t know how else to put it any other way this time but for us to move along. these places are in such disrare, and i would love for stellar management, the best company we have evered had to rebuild. i can t take the neighbor s dirty bath water coming up, the long walk to the laundry room in my older years. a
of the park merced e.i.r. and alternate development scenarios. conditions are also considered. proceed proceeding as proposed is prejudicial to the outcome for the board of supervisors consideration as it narrows options, adopts agreements with possible legal comblicts and leads to litigation and is supported by a necessary general plan and its implementation. therefore this item violates the necessity for due process. we have asked and provided you with alternative scenarios, none of which have been considered or acknowledged. they are all professionally legitimate. therefore, to proceed on a singular idea is prejudicial before the outcome of such things as e.i.r. or the sustainability of time certain needs. there is no guarantee of a performance bond that would ensure the risk to the city, proving that you can under pin it, given the possibility i will legality or questionability. you should not proceed with this hearing any further. supervisor mar: thank you. my name
unemployed. in a project like this where the area is committed will provide a tremendous amount of work. therefore i stand in support of this. i am bernie, and i am the principal appellant for san francisco tomorrow. may i have more time? we are limiting to two minutes per person. including the principal appellant. i am going to read our statement. approval for park merced exroosm should be aborted now. until such time as fainlscation of the park merced e.i.r. and alternate development scenarios. conditions are also considered. proceed proceeding as proposed is prejudicial to the outcome for the board of supervisors consideration as it narrows options, adopts agreements with possible legal comblicts and leads to litigation and is supported by a necessary general plan and its implementation. therefore this item violates the necessity for due process. we have asked and provided you with alternative scenarios, none of which have been considered or acknowledged. they are a