intelligence. so, they never want to talk about those jobs and that s what i think we should be focused on. eric: the proposal is this, you re a corporation and now you have humans on the line and you take the humans off and make it a robotic line. now, the corporation s going to be taxed for profits, but now they want to say that the robots, the corporation is using, income, individual income taxes for a robot goes to the government as well. is there no end to the taxation? i actually think me and donald trump might agree on this one pt here is the thing, these jobs are taking away hard-working manufacturing jobs from americans, ie, like the carrier plant where they have been given a tax by the state of indiana to automate. if these robots are taking an american job, then these companies should have to put some skin in the game for taking away an american job. eric: all right, lisa, yes. again, there s no end to the liberal s desire to tax people and robots. i think that me and do
and james rosen. all right, james, first, an overview about this news conference in your assessment. the hand-to-hand combat with selected conference of the news media whom mr. trump deemed especially dishonest or irresponsible in their reporting. there was a lot of news. we learn, for example, that the repeal and replace for obamacare will happen, as mr. trump said, essentially, simultaneously. we learned that we are expecting a major report on the hacking defenses within 90 days and that we should get a supreme court nominee within the first two weeks of the trump presidency. there was a lot to it, substantively, quite apart from the sort of raucous flavor of the thing. i think in all, it made good on his promise that he made when he visited the carrier plant in indiana and november. he said, if it is not presidential, that s okay. that s okay. i think he isefine what it means for us to have a presidential news conference. bret: i didn t invite you on here for the impression, add
and james rosen. all right, james, first, an overview about this news conference in your assessment. the hand-to-hand combat with selected conference of the news media whom mr. trump deemed especially dishonest or irresponsible in their reporting. there was a lot of news. we learn, for example, that the repeal and replace for obamacare will happen, as mr. trump said, essentially, simultaneously. we learned that we are expecting a major report on the hacking defenses within 90 days and that we should get a supreme court nominee within the first two weeks of the trump presidency. there was a lot to it, substantively, quite apart from the sort of raucous flavor of the thing. i think in all, it made good on his promise that he made when he visited the carrier plant in indiana and november. he said, if it is not presidential, that s okay. that s okay. i think he is going to redefine what it means for us to have a presidential news conference. bret: i didn t invite you on here for the im
and just set it, forget it and do it over and over. they don t just belong to the rich but. keep it there. i want to ask you about the trump administration. don t ever sell. the trump administration coming in here, one of the things i covered was this carrier plant and trump announcing these jobs that had come back to the united states that these manufacturing jobs in indianapolis here. you have a critique about this because you don t buy it. i mean, you ve said before that you think this is somewhat of a somewhat. explain how. what happened was the taxpayers of indiana bribed carrier to either bring the jobs back or keep the jobs there. that can t be done. you can t have the taxpayers bribing every company that s threatening to leave and take jobs somewhere else and i don t believe in general that the government should control the movement of capital or the
whether or not they actually deserve it, and so trump will get credit for the positive economic trends. whether or not he deserves it. he ll take the blame for the negative economic trends, whether or not they re his fault. this seems to be in the regular course of events. and if history proves correct, if when he gets the negative, he will blame it on the administration before, as we ve seen with every president past. absolutely. exactly right. so he has run into this. we saw this with the carrier announcement in indiana. where he made the announcement and i spoke with some of the workers in the plan, they were very thankful for the announcement, that he was there, that he helped keep jobs at that plant, at that carrier plant. but it was off. the numbers were wrong. the timing of this announcement. some of the some of these jobs had already been announced. if you don t get it squarely right, does it diminish kind of the victory lap he can take when he maybe should deserve cred