Inches of snow. 3 inches for philadelphia, ten in parts of the south jersey as expect closer to the coast as we were. It was powdery snow, easy to clean up. We didnt see any melting. The it is so cold. It is still on the ground. Icy spots untreated surfaces, sidewalks, take it easy. We have to battle wind. Rough wind chills. The pretty nasty all day to day. It the will be coldest day since last february, valentines day in 2016. High temperatures will struggle to get the in the the 20s. That is half of the story. We will feel more like Single Digits and near zero at times factor in that win. We are dry across the region. Clear skies up in the city. 17 degrees at the airport northwest breeze a at 13. It will pick up. Current wind chill value feeling like four on exposed skin. Actual air temperature stuck in the teens. Single digits in mound pocono. We will in the budge a whole lot more. Another 10 degrees if were luck a cross the region. There is those wind currently sustained out of the
Interest who are outside of the 150 radius for the 311 notification. They are encouraging the commission to consider an alternative plan design by a neighbor that would reduce the rear massing. The Residential Design Team first reviewed the proposal in march and again after the dr was filed. They determined that there are no exception or extraordinary circumstances to the project that is as presented to the Planning Commission and in this abbreviated format, staffs recommendation to the commission is to not take discretionary review and approve the Building Permit, that concludes my presentation. Thank you. Dr requester, your team has five minutes. Thank you, geek,president wu and members of the Commission Im susan holey and im representing the dr requester. As staff mentioned the request is support by a petition of 59 area residents most of them within the 150 radius and othersust beyond it in the neighborhood, as well as 30 letters from concerned neighbors. I wasnt able to hear all o
In opposition, including one from the upper noe Neighbors Group and a petition with 59 signatures. This included several residents on the south side of the duncan street and further down on 27th interest who are outside of the 150 radius for the 311 notification. They are encouraging the commission to consider an alternative plan design by a neighbor that would reduce the rear massing. The Residential Design Team first reviewed the proposal in march and again after the dr was filed. They determined that there are no exception or extraordinary circumstances to the project that is as presented to the Planning Commission and in this abbreviated format, staffs recommendation to the commission is to not take discretionary review and approve the Building Permit, that concludes my presentation. Thank you. Dr requester, your team has five minutes. Thank you, geek,president wu and members of the Commission Im susan holey and im representing the dr requester. As staff mentioned the request is su
No exception or extraordinary circumstances to the project that is as presented to the Planning Commission and in this abbreviated format, staffs recommendation to the commission is to not take discretionary review and approve the Building Permit, that concludes my presentation. Thank you. Dr requester, your team has five minutes. Thank you, geek,president wu and members of the Commission Im susan holey and im representing the dr requester. As staff mentioned the request is support by a petition of 59 area residents most of them within the 150 radius and othersust beyond it in the neighborhood, as well as 30 letters from concerned neighbors. I wasnt able to hear all of the last discussion because of the problems with the capacity of the room and the next item that is coming up, but i did see the beginning and it appears there are some overlapping issues in terms of midblock open space and the blocking nature of the building, but our issue is much simpler than the one you were dealing w
It extends to the 45 required rear yard and beyond that a one story bump out extends it another 8 into the required rear yard as allowable as an allowable obstruction under section 1 36 of the code. The subject building currently is one of the shallowest in depth on this block and will be increased in Square Footage from 1600 to 3849 square feet. This written dimension has been corrected on the plans originally it had 3150 square feet. The property constructed in 1905 was evaluated by the preservation staff and found to be a contributor to a district under ceqa. Changes to the original design occurreds a result of the Historic Resource determination to adhere to the secretary of interiorase standards for rehabilitation. The project as revised meets all the preservation and planning code requirements and does not require further environmental review. Because of the property has been found to be a resource, the property had stricter demolition requirements to retain the original cottage