The argument annexed in case, thank you mister chief justice. Reasonable suspicion is the minimal standard,. Common sense judgment is the difference between ordinary suspicion experiences and hear the vehicle on the road the registered driver was incapable of operating the vehicle had to believe that under common sense to register shirt user was,. The common sense belief that, is the one that has been recognized by judges in 12 states, across the country, that is a findings, registered owner of the vehicle of the driver is a common sense influence, some may argue that the existence of her suspended. But the ugly 15 courts i just mention 11 of them have dealt with this process iteration, those have indicated that this reasonable suspicion continues to exist or, indeed, the factual critic of those, across the country, those are register, not register and continue to drive. Here deputy mayor, relied upon the common sense understanding, and at the pervasiveness of autumn a bill in the Unit
Discrimination in terms of rights, protections, and recourse that they needed in the courts should anything happen to them. Host you said it should be the 28th amendment, why isnt it . Guest we have been working on this for 100 years, a century. First proposed by alice paul who gave us the womens vote and we are celebrating and so happy about. After she did that she thought there needed to be one more thing added, and that was to put this clause that said we cannot discriminate based on sex. We have been working on that for 100 years. Congress passed it in 1972, quite a while ago. And people have been working, and we needed to get 38 states. When the time limit expired, we only got to 35. Miraculously, in recent days, in 2017, nevada ratified the e. R. A. And in 2018, illinois ratified your the e. R. A. And all of us sitting in the office were like, what is going on . Does that count . We were told by our legal scholars that it does count. We had such an extraordinary week last week. T
At 9 00 a. M. , accuracy in media president adam g host we are live outside the Supreme Court today as the justices will hear arguments for and against socalled daca, the Immigration Program that allows undocumented people brought here as children to the United States by their parents to remain in the country. We want to get your thoughts on daca as well as the Supreme Court decision. Democrats, 2027488000. Republicans, 2027488001. Independents, 2027488002. You can also a fourth line for Daca Recipients, 2027488003. You can text us at that number as well with your first name, city, and state, 2027488003. Go to twitter at cspanwj or join the conversation at facebook. Com cspan. We will get to your thoughts on daca and the Supreme Court arguments in a minute. Joining us on the phone is greg, i Supreme Court a Supreme Court reporter for bloomberg news. Remind viewers what this case is about. Guest good morning, greta. The case started in 2012 when barack obama said he was going to give yo
Everyone. You cannot discriminate based on sex. A few words, that is it. Nothing controversial, just a country should provide equal protections to all, and when the constitution was written, women were deliberately left out and we believe that because of that they have been paying for discrimination in terms of rights, protections, and recourse that they needed in the courts should anything happen to them. You said it should be the 20th amendment, why isnt it . We have been working on this for 100 years, a century. First proposed by alice paul who gave us the womens vote and we are celebrating and so happy about. After she did that she thought there needed to be one more thing added, and that was to put this clause that said we cannot discriminate based on sex. You have been working on that for 100 years. Congress passed it in 1972, quite a while ago. And people have been working, and we needed to get 38 states. When the time limit expired, we only got to 35. Miraculously, in recent da
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. My name is matt miller. I service the president and ceo here at the national War One Museum immemorial it is my pleasure to welcome you here to what i think its going to be an extraordinary couple of days to thing together and learn at the symposium. We are delighted to be house need networking with so many partners to create yet another, i think, exceptional opportunity for us. Whilst you are here, i hope that you take time to spend some time in the galleries. The special exhibition, piece 1919, certainly fits with this theme and he will enjoy that as well as our main galleries where we are preparing for the opening of a new exhibition this week on the vietnam war, 1945, 1975. That is not open until next weekend so its a teaser for you. But we invite those of you who are able to come back through the next several months 30 memorial day weekend of next year to come back and take in really quite exceptional exhibition that also provides the links and