developed in the 19505, the plan was to have a city within a city, with 2,000 flats, landscaped gardens, a lake, school and church right on the doorstep. and it s now home to the biggest art centre in europe. it s a prime example of brutalist architecture. and although it s not everyone s cup of tea, it s definitely iconic and has even attracted more modern icons to make their own art here. this is definitely a vision of a utopian community, as it was in the 50s or 60s. but the way we think about smart living hasn tjust been heading in one direction. lights on. lights off. blinds up. blinds down. robo vacuum, vacuum. robo vacuum, go home. you may have seen home appliances like these that connect to your wi fi router and even onto the internet itself, so they can be monitored and controlled remotely. these days, it is totally possible to control smart appliances in your home using an app, and get information back from them. but in the future, of course, we will want even mor
documents, manage cloud severances and power business apps. but that was not the only new release from amazon as michelle fleury reports from new york. amazon announced 0, new chat for people to use at work there seems to be a dispute over where the name comes from. dispute over where the name comes from- comes from. some say it is after the comes from. some say it is after the john comes from. some say it is after the john bond - comes from. some say it is after the john bond movies i comes from. some say it is - after the john bond movies and after thejohn bond movies and some seders from star trek. either way this is a big deal. amazon may have not built chat gpt but it now has its own generative ai helper which is designed to assist employees with daily tasks whether it is answering questions about company policy, to coding to some mooring summarising strategy documents. crucially it will compete with other corporate chat lots including copilot by microsoft and duit
a investment. warm welcome to the programme. a warm welcome to the programme. good morning. sounds like a bit of a mess in germany in terms of trying to sort out the money matters so they can go ahead with much needed spending, your take? go ahead with much needed spending, yourtake? it is go ahead with much needed spending, your take?- spending, your take? it is a mess something spending, your take? it is a mess something that - spending, your take? it is a mess something that the i mess something that the introduction said is self imposed, this constitutional break supposed to be stopping undue spending and returning to balanced budget, it was introduced into 2009 at a time when germany thought it could beat off the rest of the world in terms of its own economic competitiveness, it ought then the euro crisis would not be something that would be hugely problematic for it. so it had built into the constitution its commitment, to have a balanced budget every year. and there
fossil fuel leading companies economywide not there. first reaction of heavy fossil fuel leading company economy wide response. scrutiny is good, discussion is good, the more people involved in taking action and engaging in climate change is by far the better. the more private sector engagement in this issue is better than what we saw 10, 20, 30 years ago when it was a very governmental driven process. if we go back, at cop27 a loss and damage fund was agreed upon for richer countries to pay the poorer countries which were suffering the impacts of climate change. how do you see that working out, because that has been one of the numerous sticking points? the private sector needs to get far more engaged in discussion around adaptation to finance too. loss and damage just one element that is going to help build more resilient society. insurance needs to be more engaged, project developments, fiancing and constructing. particularly in asia, as it urbanises and develops economies
is good, discussion is good, the more people involved in taking action and engaging in climate change is by far the better, the more private sector engagement in this issue is better than what we saw ten, 20, 30 years better than what we saw ten, 20,30 years ago when it better than what we saw ten, 20, 30 years ago when it was government driven process. it government driven process. if we go back there at cop27, a loss and damage fund was agreed upon for richer countries to pay poor countries which were suffering the impacts of climate change. how do you see that working out, because that has been run of the numerous sticking points? the has been run of the numerous sticking points? sticking points? the private sector needs sticking points? the private sector needs to sticking points? the private sector needs to get - sticking points? the private sector needs to get far - sticking points? the private| sector needs to get far more engaged. loss and damagejust one element