recognizing the january six investigation. renewed focus by jack smith s investigators on a 2020 oval office meeting where trump allies allegedly skimmed what the former president about seizing voting machines and overturning the election. also tonight, where s prigozhin? no word from the wagner mercenary leader supposedly ex out to belarus for leading a mutiny against the kremlin. as he returned to the motherland? and what will vladimir putin due to him there? and marjorie taylor greene, is she too much, even pretty conservative freedom caucus. a report that she may have been boarded up by her fellow republicans. we begin tonight with the breaking news, what multiple sources are telling cnn about that turbulent december 18th 2020 oval office meeting, involving the former president on the disgraced general michael flynn, lawyer sydney powell and former dot com ceo. our kaitlan collins is part of the reporting team that has the exclusive. she joins me here. what have you learn
all right, so, the curtain has fallen on the january 6th committee s first round of hearings. and now, the question is, now what? so, the committee has made clear they are going to resume hearings in september. we know that is. much would happens between now and until then? now in a sense, it really is our turn. we in the news media, and you at home have a responsibility to take everything that has been presented and work to understand what exactly it means. not just in this quick knee-jerk manner that happened so often in the minutes after one of the hearings, but also in a deeper sense. when all the pieces of the puzzle can come together. let s listen to liz cheney this week in her closing statement about this. every american must consider this. that a president who is willing to make choices, donald trump made during the violence of january 6th, ever be trusted with any position of authority and our great nation again. there s probably nothing i agree with liz cheney o
for nearly five hours as rioters overwhelmed the capitol, looking, chanting, to hang him. we were told they came within 40 feet of the vice president s evacuation route and we re also learning new details about a heated phone call between trump and pence on that morning of january 6th. this is what witnesses include ing ivanka said about trump s demeanor on the call. i remember hearing the word wimp, he called him a wimp, i don t remember, he said, you are a wimp, you ll be a wimp. it was a different tone than i d heard him take with the vice president before. also a major new piece of evidence revealed by the committee, john eastman, the conservative lawyer central to the plans to overturn the election results asked for a pardon after january 6th. and new this morning, the new york times obtained a copy of a letter sent by the house select committee to ginni thomas, the way of supreme court justice clarence thomas. they want to speak to her next month. they have emai
never come back in now if they manage to stay afloat they are going to be gone for good. so shame on gavin newsom as the 1 bright spot here is were talking about automation if you got robot burger flippers and 6 robots on the horizon as they can push their buttons give the food they desire and take it there and have their way with it. 0 emotional attachment. i m kind of torn. kat: you bring it back points you don t hear that on special report. you should. kat: tyrus 1 thing we have in common is we both worked minimum wage jobs. i ve been fired by the best i worked for arby s at 6 minutes. i also worked at carl s and
the prosecutors have to make. first of all, who do we charge? second of all, are we going to charge everyone to get there in one indictment? there is no limit. you can charge 30 people together or break it up into smaller chunks. finally, what level of perspective we take on the case as a whole. are we going to go for the more discreet tangible items, for example, they submitted these false forms to the archives, the for select their forms, or are we going to take a broader, global view and charge this as a wide ranging conspiracy. the advantage of a broad is that you get the put the evidence in front of a jury and explain the whole thing to them, but the advantage of going specific is that you get to keep it concise to the point and more easily digestible. these are questions the prosecutors wrestle with in every case. stay with us. i want to bring in cnn s carla suarez was alleged documents coconspirator. what not to it was a rain today. not there was the guy recorded on the surr