Now again, we come back to the nsas dual functions and see over and over again whenever they weigh Information Assurance it gets surveilness, this side wins. So its very unclear how this weighing process is going to play out. And actually one of the reasons its unclear is that theres no transparency built into it. I think one of the key things we continually talk about throughout this is the need for Greater Transparency and how things are being applied. And they havent talked about if any numbers are going to be made public about this process. Who is going to be aware of how many vulnerabilities they turn over every year and how many they keep back. How many days on average that they keep things back. So these are core questions that need to be answered. Things that can be made public. Numbers that can be made public without great risk to National Security if any risk at all. And its not built into this process. Its just inherently kind of tilted in one direction from the very beginni
i have my bracelet on. i am equipped, man. we do it with the programs, here. >nancy, are you willing to come up here? how old are you? your three? . like your bow tie, manager o this is my daughter, lily. dad, you stand right there. you can make any speech such you want, in here. william, are you ready? senator, will you raise your right hand? do you solemnly swear that you will support and defend the constitution of the united states against all enemies, foreign and domestic? duties of the office on which you god? i do. we are going to do a picture. william, will you hold this for me? make it quick. here we go. . you are ok. you did it. i think clearly and wants to take a picture. i think all it wants to take a picture. i think lily wants to take a picture. [inaudible] thank you for your patience. i think that he wants to speak. here, but the girl. i need to borrow that back. i will trade you. here s the deal. if you can tell me which hand is in,