writing, fact, finding this is in contrast, to a paragraph, a page and a half on the shadow docket, that took no notice of any of the suffering, of the people in texas. this is a point by point by point, including in the footnotes, which are amazing, reputation of the carelessness of the supreme court. i feel like if the supreme court wanted to get out under the complete self known, how much they embarrassed themselves, on september, first this is a vehicle to say you know what, judge pittman did better. and we will just stand down. whether they will do that or not i don t know. that would be fun to read, neil, you have experience with the supreme court and the appellate level, all the way through the court system. what happens next in this case? and what is your reaction to this order tonight? first the reaction to the
correspondent for slate.com and host of the podcast atticus, and neal katyal, a former acting solicitor general and an msnbc legal contributor, and dahlia, i want to go to you first with what you think the supreme court s reaction to this might be, that is your beat, the supreme court. they took a different view about any possible injunction here. i never want to predict, lawrence, what the supreme court is going to do. i want to say that this is an extraordinary piece of judicial writing, judicial fact finding. this in contrast to a paragraph, a page and a half on the shadow docket that took no notice of any of the suffering of people in texas. this is a point by point by point including in the footnotes, which are amazing reputation of the carelessness of the supreme court, i feel