how much of a concern is that for you, rod rosenstein react to go this position? i think it s an unusual position to find yourself in. only on the job for two weeks when this happened and when comey was fired. blues he had been asked to do a memo about comey s ineptitude in coming out at that hillary clinton press conference and talking about the decision by the fbi not to pursue a prosecution there. and then all of a sudden, that memo which i could have written myself and i agree with 100% is used by donald trump as basically a protectional reason for cart blanch. right. for firing james comey. so he felt used. here he was coming in, taking on a very important job in the justice department, a career doj guy who rose through the ranks up to being a u.s. attorney and then deputy attorney general and all of a sudden he finds himself with this crazy president who has taken a memo that is a serious memo which is absolutely correct and then being used to
sean: i was listening to a special council of department of justice and i m thinking where is the solicitor general? not confirmed, not appointed. sean: or even bring again temporarily outside counsel strong, disciplined advocates instead of a career doj guy that i didn t get the impression rick even did his due diligence and preparing for this case? i don t fault the administration i felt the department of justice but it was painful to watch this. it was painful to listen to this argument. it was because the lawyers didn t have their heart and it s it s, lawyer dominic laura is also correct. none of the questions asked by these judges, including the ridiculous question about motive, you know the answer to that should have been? so what? that s irrelevant. this isn t an evidentiary hearing. this is a decision where a district court judge enjoyed the president of the united states from something he has the statutory constitutional authority to do, that is the
not confirmed, not appointed. sean: or even bring in temporarily outside counsel strong, disciplined advocates instead of a career doj guy that i didn t get the impression even did his due diligence in preparing for this case? i don t fault the administration i felt the department of justice but it was painful to listen to this argument because it was it s going to the supreme court. the answer to that should have been when they asked that question, so what? what does that have to do? is an evidentiary hearing. this is a decision where a district court judge joined the president of the unit is date from something he has the constitutional authority to do. that is the only question there,