supreme area court, under statute, must rule by january 17th, and then it can go to the main supreme judicial court, and then to the u.s. supreme court. we are on a very compressed timeline, and that was part of the requirements under statute. i was required once the challengers filed that challenge, within five days of certifying the signatures, they had to file the challenge within five days, i had to hold a hearing within five days, and issue a decision with a wake of the conclusion of the hearing. madam secretary, i appreciate your time tonight, thank you. thank you. with us now, cnn contributor former nixon white house counsel john dean, also former federal prosecutor, jessica roth, she is currently teaching at cardoza law school here in new york. do you buy what she says, legally? i thought the way that she laid out what her responsibility is and authority is under mains law, was very persuasive. and i read her opinion, it was lengthy, thorough opinion, which is also quit
have told us that they re a little concerned about reputational damage or possibly alienating their clients. but in talking to several sources i have down in the florida defense bar, we do expect that he will be able to find lawyers, especially if he is willing to pay up front. this is of course the case of a lifetime, but it might take a little while before he finalize his team. then they ll need those security clearances because there is such sensitive material in this case. and again, that all adds up in terms of the time it takes and when this case is eventually heard. a former president of the united states with the condition if he pays up front. extraordinary. yep. paula reid, thank you very much for that. one of our next guests, a fo the headline, don t automatically write off the judge in the trump documents case. nick akerman joins us. he is also a prosecutor for new york s southern district as jessica roth, who is currently a professor at manhattan s cardoza law schoo
Convenors: Prof.s Miguel Centeno, Federico Fabbrini, Kim Lane Scheppele Hosts: Princeton School of Public & International Affairs (SPIA) in cooperation with Dublin City University (DCU) Law Research Centre ABSTRACT: The Covid-19 pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges for constitutional democracies. To contain the spread of contagions liberal-democratic countries around the world have taken a variety of public health measures, ranging from the restrictions on the movement and gathering of people, to compulsory behaviours (i.e. masks-wearing and mandatory vaccinations), to even the postponement of elections. As such, the pandemic and the responses to it have raised important challenges for the protection of fundamental rights and constitutional liberties, for separation of powers and checks and balances, and for democracy and the rule of law. At the same time, the different approaches embraced by various jurisdictions have highlighted competing strategies in established const
maggie and paul. when you look at this in it s totality, common sense and human nature can speak for them. and they deserve a voice. and tomorrow, anderson, when the defense delivers its closing argument, i think we can expect to certainly highlight reasonable doubt and to try to convince the jury that the man the state has painted as a perennial liar can now tell the truth and is telling the truth, and the defense, i think, will also try and convince the jury that even though alex murdaugh has is a liar and thief, but that does make him a murder. anderson? randi kaye, appreciate, it joining us now cnn legal analyst joey jackson, also jessica roth, former federal prosecutor, now teaches at cardoza law school here in new york. we talked today about the prosecutions closing arguments, we have you on the timeline, we saw that. do you think that s the most effective argument? i do think that s the most
this is a political ping-pong port to rile up the base so that people will come up as the speaker said in november. once you are on u.s. soil, you may not have made a legal entry by the terms of our immigration law has called them, a professor of law at cardoza law school in new york, but you are entitled to due process and that is a credible fear hearing and to the kinds of protections that you would imagine. and, again, let s keep this simple on this beautiful sunday. these people are here for mercy. for us to even insinuate that we re not going to give them the basic humanity, which is a day in court, and water and food, is inhumane. i want to go to what has been part of that, which those who are saying yes, they are afforded, again, all these rights and privileges. the 14th amendment. in the 14th amendment when you look at the specific wording if there, no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges and