huh? capital t for thing. hundreds of billions for climate change. deficit reduction and tax hikes. it could also turbocharge the i.r.s. more on that in a moment. dana: democrats named it the inflation reduction act. republicans say it s laughable and not even bernie sanders is buying it. i want to take a moment to say a few words about the so-called inflation reduction act that we are debating this evening. i say so-called, by the way, because according to the cbo and other economic organizations that have studied this bill, it will, in fact, have a minimal impact on inflation. dana: team fox coverage. marc thiessen is on deck with analysis. we begin with jacqui heinrich at the white house. democrats certainly think that bringing key priorities on healthcare and climate across the finish line ahead of the mid-terms will turn things around for them. poll after poll has shown that the biggest problem for the president and his party is inflation. and even though they ve
in the cross fire as the war between israel and hamas escalates, and questions of mount about gaza s future. former congresswoman jane harmon is here to discuss. trump s on trial, don jr. prepares to return to the stand in the new york civil fraud trial while his father suffers a setback in florida, for now. charles coleman junior will be here with insights on what it all means. and, spotlight los angeles, mayor karen bass tells me about her old efforts to ease the homeless crisis in los angeles, and how she is helping other big city mayors meet the challenge. i m jonathan capehart, this is the saturday show. this week started with democrats hair on fire. on monday a new york times poll showed presidential biden trailing donald trump in five out of six key battleground states. by tuesday night, voters had their say, and it was not good news for republicans. they were trounced at the polls on election night, after voters in ohio, kentucky, and virginia soundly rejected candida
happy thanksgiving to you, clay travis. dana does sports. they have a spot for you on fs1. i could get fired and show up there. you never know. bill: you are right about the wolverine eats the buckeye. it s big. they call it the game. capital t. dana: i ll tune in. bill: danger in dallas. you have lacks bail policies putting violent criminals back on the street. local officials are demanding change. house republicans gain another seat, wow. several races still remain undecided two weeks after election day. why is it taking so long? karl rove has some ideas. we ll talk to karl coming up.
it would have been a hug that i would only had given my husband. meaning? it s a very intimate hug. a little creepy, but the following saturday as was their custom, teresa and her son stopped by comics world. michael slipped her a note. would you read that note for the jury. you look very, very, very pretty today. thanks for coming in. sincerely, michael. publicly scornful of his wife, hitting on other women and now a longtime friend of barbara s was testifying that her friends and family were all well aware with of capital t, trouble, in the marriage. kathy got a call from bausch weeks before the murder. she was crying, very upset. mike wanted a divorce. and did she convey to you whether she would agree to that? oh, she did not want a divorce. prosecutor fox then asked the witness about seeing the defendant at barb s funeral. i overheard mike saying to his mother yelling out, mom, did you call the insurance company?
presidents not himself and to protect the presidency, capital t, capital p. we ve heard the same defense flps attorney general william barr who are said at every gave juncture is the presidency has done what it s supposed to do which is to provide leadership and direction. if you destroy the presidency and make it can an errand boy for congress, we ll be a more divide add nation. tim it, you wrote a great column about this moment. let s decide what kind of presidency we want the country to have in the future just as the president did monday evening. is it the president i he and william barr want or does it remain largely within the boundaries in the constitution that offers a rich history of congressional oversight and separation of powers? this debate goes back to george w. bush recently the power of the executive. how is this time different?