wung thing that start me is that part of the reason, part of the reason was because of those serious leaks with other presidential leaders, they started to, they would call it neck it down to make it smaller. the people who could have access to these conversations. so remember, they re going to come back i would imagine. do you believe that, that s that the reason. i don t know. obviousliy lgiven the context, u would want to see these conversations to make sure it was consist went that. but here s the other problem. you don t want that information to get out or the president of the united states, this one or any other, will never be able to have a candid conversation on those phones with another foreign leader. if you do this, it has to be tight, be a small review and should not be made public for the reason of you have to have this cape bability to be candid with leaders overseas.
adversary. they have some cape bability, b the president is not helping with his tweets. you sit on the armed services committee. there are many obviously problems with this. but one is that the potential of this escalating is big. once you send in bombers and fighters. the chance is possible that you lose a pilot. there you go. you re escalating the situation. and you would think at least from what he said in the past this goes against the president s instincts, which are not to get. in too deep. what do you see happening here? there seems to be an meeleme of strategic and tactical confusion. when the president said we re out of syria and out soon, that