everything. he would totally defeat purpose of congressional oversight if the witnesses, for example, about the security clearance process can t testify, witnesses about the immigration and children in cages can t testify. if don mcgahn can t testify. these are all things that cannot happen. the judge wrote a very thorough and very well thought out opinion, and i think if anything is clear from watergate, it s that you cannot just thumb your nose at congress and you can t thumb your nose at a justice department subpoena. and that s what the president is setting himself up to do is to be above the law and just say i ll do what i want to do and our whole constitution is based on the fact that people will follow the law. glen kirschner, you were in the courtroom when this case was argued and here you have an opinion by the judge in your hands today saying he actually didn t hear any serious issues raised by president trump s lawyer.
process can t testify, witnesses about the immigration and children in cages can t testify. if don mcgahn can t testify. these are all things that cannot happen. the judge wrote a very thorough and very well thought out opinion, and i think if anything is clear from watergate, it s that you cannot just thumb your nose at congress and you can t thumb your nose at a justice department subpoena. and that s what the president is setting himself up to do is to be above the law and just say i ll do what i want to do and our whole constitution is based on the fact that people will follow the law. glen kirschner, you were in the courtroom when this case was argued and here you have an opinion by the judge in your hands today saying he actually didn t hear any serious issues raised by president trump s lawyer. yeah, lawrence, i want to borrow a phrase from the mueller report. judge meta s ruling was a sweeping and systemic rebuke of the president s claims that he, one, is above the law and
university of texas at austin is suing o neal saying the portrait is theirs, that fawcett left to them after her death in 2009. is his story believable? is that s going to be crucial. we re only hearing about this through the experience of ryan o neal. he s the sole survivor. andy warhol can t testify, farrah fawcett can t testify. reporter: o neal took the stand on monday saying he, quote, removed the painting a week or more after she died from her condo. o neal says the portrait of the iconic charlie angels star was above his bed when fawcett caught him between the sheets with a 25-year-old woman which led to hair breakup in 1997. he says he removed the portrait and returned it to fawcett because his, quote, young friend was uncomfortable. the portrait is one of two similar prints warhol created in