to lie. what does the indictment say, mimi, that would lead you to believe otherwise? chris, first of all, i mean, the fact that he s still claiming he didn t lie or if he did lie it wasn t about material things, is so just belied by this indictment. mueller does a great job, of course, of spelling out. he said he had no e-mail, no text communications with persons one or two. and then he details the actual e-mails or text messages. so, you know, he s contradicted by hard evidence that doesn t lie, can t lie, can t really be questioned. for him to claim this as immaterial, i mean, it s so obviously every question, every statement in here is so central to mueller s mission to what the senate and congress were trying to get at about coordination. so, again, just completely a false statement right in front of our face about it. to me, there is so much in
detectives from austin, p.d. and everyone is moving and once the fedex explosion hit, it was moving lightning fast. is it feasible, do you think, that his roommates would be unaware he was billing these bombs if they were living in the same apartment based on what we know? i guess i should never be surprised at somehow some people could be unaware. they are going to face questions. and here is the bottom line. if they tell the agents the truth, can t lie to atf or the fbi. you have to tell the truth. if they tell the truth, and they had no parpg, they weren t aiders or abetter or failing to report the crime, they are just questioned and let go. but you remember in the boston marathon bombing case, there were some students who lied to the agents, might have disposed of dom bomb materials and
that are committed to this every single day inside of russia, and we re meddling in elections like they ve done in the united states in eastern europe and france and with uk brexit election, that is part of it. what s different from the soviet union is not that this is the main effort like the soviet union did. what s the same is that russia s operating on a global information network. that truly gives them some leverage that the soviet union did not have. yes, hammer them with sanctions and yes, listen when they conduct a cyberattack on a critical infrastructure as they did in the united states, like an electric grid or attack our water then we have the number one offensive cyber capability in the world and we should respond in time. we have got to take the gloves off. the one thing that putin truly understands remember what we re dealing with here, we re dealing with a thug and a bully. the one thing he understands is
smells bad given the fact that we found out later earlier almost half a million dollars from governor. their references. the dossier and the use of that. to spy on the trump official. this comes down to one thing, fbi agents can t lie. if you like, you can t take the stand. and individuals go to prison for lying to fbi investigators. even if you re not under oath it is a crime ask michael flynn. four of the plea deals that he has gotten are related to lie to the fbi or investigators. again, in his statement that he put out. he makes it about president trump and he makes it about the molar investigation.
will it be under oath? what will the scope of it be? those things are being negotiated. right. if you re a lawyer for the president, the obvious thing is that you want a narrow scope. you want it not under oath. yeah. doesn t it have to be under oath? there s no have to. mueller could have it in with his investigative advisers. technically, can t lie to the feds. it s a crime. the closer to where you get where bill clinton wound up, in front of a grand jury, which is obviously under oath, that starts to bring with it legal predicaments. you want to avoid as much legality. sorry, david. and president clinton was subpoenaed by the grand jury, the first time that had happened. that s not the case here. but if you re representing president trump, you want to know as much about what the questions are going to be. and i think there s real questions about how far afield