business hold on a second. he takes a very different position. specifically talk about because when you came on the set, you were bothered that. his body of work is broader than the 10-minute interview. he is a great interview. i loved it. i think you can engage in short-term stimulus, long-term spending control. and you can go about providing a tax reform package that would encourage spending, job creation plan in the private sector. that s where i disagree with mr. krugman. i think he could emphasize that more. no disrespect to my friend lawrence. but at the end of the day, the country could use a little more certainty in the marketplace. could use a little more certainty in the regulatory environment. and if you ran a big business, you had shareholders you were responsible to, you would answer differently than krugman did. canesian economics. he believed when you had good times, you ran balanced budgets.
spending. every republican candidate in the race for 2012 wants to reduce government. if we were to impose their approach, what would it do it our faltering recovery. that s what it is.รง it would take it from faltering to flat lining. mitch mcconnell said he is not guided by canesian economics. he got it by wanting the fot lose. the idea of throwing the economy under the bus for your own political gain is not something the american people have shhave to deal with right now. there others who simply don t believe these measures have worked. the evidence including from our nonpartisan cvo is that stimulus measures have been helpful and now what we have is a clear look at the other side. what happens if you take this stuff serious she, sure enough as long as the private sector is still down on the mat, not