the story. tell us about emmanuel macron s a project, was the receptiveness to take this claim from president macron for them to take it forward, that they could do more to andy war in ukraine? well, he is about to start a slew of meetings with chinese leaders with lee chung yong followed by xi jinping, leaders with lee chung yong followed by xijinping, the president of china. beijing has always said it is neutral when it comes to the war in ukraine and it has refused to condemn russia s aggression, for example, at the united nations and it has also proposed the 12 point peace plan, but many of our viewers will remember president xijinping s our viewers will remember president xi jinping s trip to moscow to meet with president putin and partly because of the timing ofjapan s prime timing of japan s prime minister s timing ofjapan s prime minister s trip to the exact same day, the pictures became a stark contrast as to how the two biggest economies in asia
quickbooks. backing you. and the trumpets they go griff: dave is giving me the wrong queue. it s like a candy war is going on. there it is. jedediah: this has been a big topic of the day. as we all know, i m right. ed: i could live without this. you could live without twix. he s got a big chocolate fan. griff: i m being bullied here. i m on the fire here. ed: he would be teasing you about this chocolate allergy. and there he is.
i . i have a favor superhe, peter parker. i had a crush on him for years, before i got married of course because that would be bad. have you been to the pizza place? his new movie is great. i m going to watch the rest of it on a flight today. you guys batman fans though? yeah. let s turn to the candy war. you may not have known it was a war. americans debating which classic treat they could give up forever. look at this treat. one has to go forever. which one do you choose. we ve got the whole list here. snickers, reese s, milky way, m&m and twiks. i think the twix has to go. you cannot put that in the same category as reese s. it s not good for humanity. i thought you were going to say kit kat. you re getting rid of quit kt
that s a central argument going on right now. the tension between, you know, the right of congress to the obligation of congress to declare war and the president s position as commander in chief. there s always been this tension. it is being heightened now because of the present situation. you first, do you have any reason to believe that george w. bush had a clear notion of what we were doing in afghanistan in the first place?ç a clear notion. no. no. do you think he had a clear notion? no. i think aside from the osama bin laden approach, no. but he left the door open for that guy to escape to tore tora bora. look, there are a lot of reasons those things went down the way they did, but it doesn t go to the fundamental question, why are we there and what will it look like when we leave? we know one person has a deep gut commitment to the military. that s john mccain, who served in vietnam, paid his price of loyalty to the country in the worst way, like six years of to
so you agree with me? yes. it ain t going to be america. it s not going to be washington, d.c. your thoughts, ron. we re not spending $2 billion a week in afghanistan to make sure that afghani kids have a good education and health care. it would be nice if we could do that. no. we re building a power grid. we have strategic we re building a power grid so they can get electricity from the former soviet public. when you re talking i can t hear you. i m talking to michael steele right now. i thought rand paul put it ç exactly right. he said i would like to see a full-blown debate in congress and in the country about what is our presence in afghanistan. you guys are moving over to the isolationists no, i m not. you re who john mccain is furious at. i m where i ve always been on this, chris, when i ran for united states senate in 2006 and to the present day. i have no problem with militarily engaging and protecting our interests if you define for me what that