president biden s the guy in charge now. he is the one in the white house. democrats control the house. they control the senate. they need to be sending cons consistent signals on this regardless of party. everyone gets to decide for themselves, chris, if they want to be vaccinated or not. it is a personal-health choice but what i found dealing with focus groups on this is if you give people the facts. which are, vaccines are like putting your seatbelt on, chris, when you get in the car. it won t guarantee you 100% if you get in an accident, you won t get seriously hurt or killed but it makes it much, much less likely and it s safe. and canada shouldn t be doing the contrary, while, at the same time, chris, asking us for help with vaccines. that kind of contradictory, hypocritical stuff, is stuff that presidents shouldn t stand up for. he needs to stand up for america, open up that border. let s get going. listen, i agree with the arguments. you couldn t be more right when it comes t
themselves, chris, if they want to be vaccinated or not. it is a personal-health choice but what i found dealing with focus groups on this is if you give people the facts. which are, vaccines are like putting your seatbelt on, chris, when you get in the car. it won t guarantee you 100% if you get in an accident, you won t get seriously hurt or killed but it makes it much, much less likely and it s safe. and canada shouldn t be doing the contrary, while, at the same time, chris, asking us for help with vaccines. that kind of contradictory, hypocritical stuff, is stuff that presidents shouldn t stand up for. he needs to stand up for america, open up that border. let s get going. listen, i agree with the arguments. you couldn t be more right when it comes to let the facts fall where they fall. if the vaccines as good as we believe it is, then the masks are being hyper prophylaxis. i totally agree with that. and, you know, your buddies over at the post. it was from a month ago and i ha
warner s proposed legislation that would essentially mandate fbi reporting of such overtures and why she was objecting to it. this is senate legislation. i am not asking you to weigh in on this. this is her objection. collins also told me mark werner s legislation requiring reporting to fbi of offers of campaign assistance from foreign government is overly broad. canada shouldn t be in the same category as russia. is there any difference? there actually isn t. it is funny she should mention canada. i like canada. who doesn t? congratulations to the raptors. but the leading principle, the leading case on this subject actually concerns a canadian. someone who was living and working in this country. it s the blumen case. the decision was written and handed down by then judge brett kavanaugh now justice kavanaugh who is no shirker when it comes
house speaker has to say about this. paul ryan says i disagree with the decision. instead of addressing the real problem in the international trade of these products, it targets america s allies when we should be working with them to address the unfair trading practices of countries like china. what do you make of that? reported that from a number of people, saying, the real bad actor is china. we need to team up with mexico and canada to take on that fact. that is why canada shouldn t be leaving the room, they should be staying on the room, and work it out. i m confident we can. if not we are sending a message to china. if we are willing to stand firm in regards to our allies, when we go after to china, the big elephant in the room, the one that is the most egregious offender of our trade policies that are against american interests, we are going to send a message to china that we are not messing around anymore. it is time to put american interest on the same playing field of othe
from roseann and think they have been saying to my key ring from samantha bee, is there a rulebook? that is the thing i am puzzled by. it sometimes seems to me that there are different standards depending on which end of the political spectrum you might identify with. in some cases, it looks like just saying i m sorry is good enough if you are joy behar and insulting questions or if you are samantha bee insulting the first family or if you are keith olbermann being very venomous and abusive all the time on twitter to all sorts of people, but if you are an anchor on this network for example who tweet something that you regret and you apologize for it, the corporate structure in america goes along with the left agitation to join a significant boycott of your show. will that happen to samantha bee? i agree actually with a point about being against the weaponization of outrage. being particularly protective of comedy and the comedy space, but shouldn t there be, if the standards are the