over the ramparts we watched were so gallantly streaming and the rockets red glare the bombs bursting in air gave proof through the night that our flag was still there oh say does that star-spangled banner yet wave over the land of the free and the home of the brave pete: celebration and outrage across the nation as the supreme court strikes down roe v wade. [chanting] throw them out! throw them out! will: protesters take to the street or some lawmakers call the court a legitimate. rachel: alexandria, what is the latest? reporter: all is quiet as of this morning. we see a lot of extra security outside the supreme court steps, we had this barrier up for quite some time but we expect crowds to grow later today. an american flag was burned as the crowd grew as the night went on. anger and sadness after the supreme court removed the protections drove v wade granted women seeking abortions nationwide. joy and gratitude spilled out of p
long-range missiles toward the ukrainian capital of kyiv. we ll have the very latest on the ongoing fight and where global leaders stand on the issue. e global leaders stand on the issue. good morning. and welcome to way too early. on this monday, june 27th. i m jonathan lemire, coming to you live from the beautiful bavarian house. we will get back to the g-7 in a moment but we start with the supreme court landmark decision to overturn roe v. wade ending the constitutional right to an abortion after nearly 50 years. the decision came after the court s conservative majority ruled 6-3 to uphold a mississippi law that bans abortions after 15 weeks. the justices then 5-4 voted on overturning roe with chief justice john roberts making it clear that his vote was only to side with the mississippi law. the majority opinion on striking down roe was written by justice samuel alito, he writes this. the constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly prot
have a federal abortion ban. we should not. the reason why we shouldn t is very simple. it is a tenth amendment. and the constitution. the constitution, which the states created the federal government, of the other way around. it is in the hands of the people, and that s where it should be. but when you are talking about a federal ban, be honest with the american people. i am being honest. we have not had 45 pro-life senators in over 100 years. so no republican president can t ban abortions, any more than a democratic president can t ban what the states are doing. don t make women decide on this issue when you know we donât have 60 senate votes. that should not be confused for being an advocate for reproductive rights and freedom. it is only on that stage that is made to feel like at moderate position. what us through what those arguments mean in practice? that s right, alicia. again, thank you so much for censoring these important health issues that are central to a democra
claiming any type of services when the woman is on her deathbed. a federal abortion ban. listen to what nikki haley and doug burnham have to say about it. i stand behind we should not have a federal abortion ban. we should not. the reason why we shouldn t is very simple. it is a tenth amendment. and the constitution. the constitution, which the states created the federal government, of the other way around. it is in the hands of the people, and that s where it should be. but when you are talking about a federal ban, be honest with the american people. i am being honest. we have not had 45 pro-life senators in over 100 years. so no republican president can t ban abortions, any more than a democratic president can t ban oldest at or. to make women decide that should not be confused for being an advocate for reproductive rights and freedom. it is only on that stage that is made to feel like at
turning back to one of our top stories this morning, the supreme court has stripped away women s constitutional protections for abortions, and now contentious legal battles are likely to erupt, as lawmakers grapple with the new landscape of abortion access. on friday, u.s. attorney general merrick garland says the justice department strongly disagrees with the court s ruling. in a statement, garland said in part, quote, this decision deals a devastating blow to rep duck tive freedom in the united states. it will have an immediate and irreversible impact on the lives of people across the country and it will be greatly disproportionate in its effect, with the greatest burdens felt by people of color and those with limited financial means. garland also said that states can t ban fda-approved abortion bills on safety ground pills on safety grounds speaking specifically about one fda approved drug. the so-called trigger laws kicking in, more than 80 prosecutors from 29 states including