republicans did push back on some of the actions taken fwi trump campaign. trump s praise was highly objectionable. are you happy they included that? poor judgment is when you eat pizza too late or close to b bedtime. they showed an eagerness. we shouldn t have ended the investigation. we learned natalia admitted she was a spy. she came in and talked to us that the republican that donald trump s campaign vendor had meddled and that they were polling in the united states u.s. persons views with no known client as to why they would be doing that work. that s lot more questions. it was immature, premature to
learned today natalia veselnitskaya admitted she was a spy. we also learned from christopher wiley who came in and talked to us from cambridge analytica that donald trump s campaign vendor had connections with julian assange and meddled in a nigerian election similar to what the russians were doing in ours and that they were polling in the united states u.s. persons views of vladimir putin with no known client as to why they d be doing that work. it was premature and irresponsible to end the investigation. when i read this and it said demonstrated poor judgment and highly objectionable, it brought me back to 2016 just before the election. comey. comey saying the same thing about hillary clinton and republicans were saying she should be put in jail for those very same words there they should have lat if they objected to those actions th
campaign vendor, the fbi and doj, when they learned they were trying to blackmail donald trump or lie about him as they should have taken steps to protect and warn trump but instead used it as a pretext to spy on him. who made those decisions? president obama was briefed twice on the dnc dossier. he was briefed on intelligence and dealing with the russian involvement in the election process, he needs to be questioned as much as hillary clinton does about what he knew and when about the clinton dossier used by the justice department to spy on political opposition. rob: your take on the russia investigation as pertains to donald trump is one that i believe rightly negative but i will take a positive out of
investigation without clinton and dnc funds. the whole thing is subject to i think being called off now by the justice department if they are brave enough based on these disclosures today. i am hearing lot of talk about the information in this memo, if they were so innocent, why did the fbi and justice department stonewall congressional requests, judicial request for information about the dossier? we learned today that the fbi authorized the payment to this clinton campaign vendor and when he was cut off allegedly the fbi still wanted his information and use the cut out, used his wife to funnel information obviously improperly to the fbi. not once, not twice, about four times including by rod rosenstein the memo alleges
fusion gps transcript? no surprise the top democrat who has been partisan on the house intelligence committee wants to release a transcript by hillary clinton s campaign vendor that is the equivalent of nixon s modify limited hang out, you may recall the game would selectively release information in a piecemeal way. we want more information, judicial watch leaking or disclosure of transcripts is right of the democrat out here. they are just hoping the american people ignore what is being released because the last transcript that was released raised questions about what clinton was up to.