Before the first debate. 1 is what you needed to make in the polls. Or having a certain amount of individual donors who gave you a dollar. The purpose of that was, we wanted to make sure that there were multiple pathways to the debate stage because some people are wellknown nationally and some arent. And they deserve, but they are very talented so they deserve an opportunity. I think we have been incredibly inclusive. 20 people made the debate stage with us two debates. And the closer you get to the primaries, and caucuses, historically, we have shown that you have to make progress. So actually the voters are having input, because they are, ive spoken to so many voters who said boy, i saw soandso on the debate stage and i had given her money. It made me proud tos feel part of it. So we have given the grassroots a role. Again, a one percent polling threshold for the first two debates. A 2 polling threshold for the next debates, i would cement that is not a high bar. Again, i would submi
Basically, you need to do this, even talking about financial sanity and where we go as a country on deficit and Government Spending for a long time. To grab his microphone and tried to do something about it because on the democratic side, nobody is talking about deficit or spending and how we are going to pay for all of this. Side, if theican routine of i hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil, and the president has called himself the king of debt and is not focusing on it. I still think we are walking toward a financial storm of immense proportions. I think we need to talk about it. I think that what im trying to do is to elevate that issue and to make it part of this National President ial debate that it is not currently. Organizatione your in the early primary states in your strategy. Again, im three weeks into it, we are just getting started. People want to join in, i asked them to go to my website and sign up. Whether that means signing up in terms of health in those early stage
Announcer joining us on newsmakers is the chair of the Democratic National committee, tom perez and joining us with the questioning are our guests from Washington Post and politico. I want to begin with the dnc rules for the debate. We sat down with john delaney, one of the candidates, and he is one of a number of candidates who said we understand why dnc put in place these debate rules but still feel it is unfair that the dnc and not voters are deciding who is in or out of this race. We have given unprecedented access to candidates. It is hard. Our first set of rules were put into place for a half months before the first debate. 1 is what you needed to make in the polls. Or having a certain amount of individual donors who gave you a dollar. The purpose of that was, we wanted to make sure that there were multiple pathways to the debate stage because some people are wellknown nationally and some arent. And they deserve, but they are very talented so they deserve an opportunity. I think
1 is what you needed to make in the polls. Or having a certain amount of individual donors who gave you a dollar. The purpose of that was, we wanted to make sure that there were multiple pathways to the debate stage because some people are wellknown nationally and some arent. And they deserve, but they are very talented so they deserve an opportunity. I think we have been incredibly inclusive. 20 people made the debate stage with us two debates. And the closer you get to the primaries, and caucuses, historically, we have shown that you have to make progress. So actually the voters are having input, because they are, ive spoken to so many voters who said boy, i saw soandso on the debate stage and i had given her money. It made me proud tos feel part of it. So we have given the grassroots a role. Again, a one percent polling threshold for the first two debates. A 2 polling threshold for the next debates, i would cement that is not a high bar. Again, i would submit that is not a high bar.
We have Peter Navarro, corey lewandowski, robi d rob o neil. Iran warning any attack on its country will be seen as an act of allout war. Watch. What would be the consequence quefns an america or saudi military strike on iran now . An allout war. We dont want to engage in a military confrontation. But we dont blink to defend our territory. Trish you know who also is not blinking . President trump. His Senior National Security Advisors are reportedly putting together a list of targets in iran should the president order strikes in retaliation to strikes on saudi arabias oil fields. So what do we do . Ease guys pushing and pushing. And i think that they believe they can continue to push, rob, because they dont think there is any appetite right now. The way i see them having them on the ground in iraq. They helped with a lot of technology tblight explosive restorm. And they know what kind of chaos. And its been a training rounds for them. They have been able to train watching how we use ou