Of complainant an incident in december of 2013 when i complained about nearly a year ago ive never heard a response nothing not to say were looking at it it selfcome within our jurisdiction silence thats a problem because what i was on the commission about mike dparz we talked about whether complaints what about stale so the fact ive not heard makes me wonder maybe i h had a valid point but want to talk about the complaints referred to the shoerns task force ive had complaint where i got a unanimous or overwhelming vote sometimes id get a response you dont think this would hundred thousand dollar hold up in court i spent time on the task force envelope was there a draft of minutes or instruction to the shoerns on those saying there has to be a Court Lawsuit case present to ethics thats not been communicated to the task force or communicated to complainants when we make a complaint i have several overwhelming unanimous decisions get figuratively gotten away what is your criteria and not
Dpjdz to the regular meeting of San Francisco Ethics Commission well begin by taking the roll call sxhaerp commissioner hayon all members obey present first is Public Comment on the appearing or not appearing on the agenda with the simplification. I came to talk about a need for responding to complaint both filed with you as well as those referred to the suspect Ordinance Task force because im involved in would both aspects of complainant an incident in december of 2013 when i complained about nearly a year ago ive never heard a response nothing not to say were looking at it it selfcome within our jurisdiction silence thats a problem because what i was on the commission about mike dparz we talked about whether complaints what about stale so the fact ive not heard makes me wonder maybe i h had a valid point but want to talk about the complaints referred to the shoerns task force ive had complaint where i got a unanimous or overwhelming vote sometimes id get a response you dont think thi
Report it is observe the committee accepted a contribution that means its over the limit of a corporation so the committee files a report which happens all the time why our contribution from abc corporation the committee admitted it accepted and it happens all the time the committee discloses receiving money from sue commissioner president dwight smith and received another money added together over 500 contribution limit as mr. Sincroy said no investigation is note in order to reach the conclusion that the committee should forfeit the money and objective weve asked the commission for the forfeiture matters there are one hundred about dont quote me in every single one a corporate contribution that was over the limited that was missing information and Important Information there was absolutely in question from the face to face of report that the committee accepted a contribution and thats why the city asked to forfeit the money we are here because of the 2 1 2 year that by definition thi
The agenda with the simplification. I came to talk about a need for responding to complaint both filed with you as well as those referred to the suspect Ordinance Task force because im involved in would both aspects of complainant an incident in december of 2013 when i complained about nearly a year ago ive never heard a response nothing not to say were looking at it it selfcome within our jurisdiction silence thats a problem because what i was on the commission about mike dparz we talked about whether complaints what about stale so the fact ive not heard makes me wonder maybe i h had a valid point but want to talk about the complaints referred to the shoerns task force ive had complaint where i got a unanimous or overwhelming vote sometimes id get a response you dont think this would hundred thousand dollar hold up in court i spent time on the task force envelope was there a draft of minutes or instruction to the shoerns on those saying there has to be a Court Lawsuit case present to
Of complainant an incident in december of 2013 when i complained about nearly a year ago ive never heard a response nothing not to say were looking at it it selfcome within our jurisdiction silence thats a problem because what i was on the commission about mike dparz we talked about whether complaints what about stale so the fact ive not heard makes me wonder maybe i h had a valid point but want to talk about the complaints referred to the shoerns task force ive had complaint where i got a unanimous or overwhelming vote sometimes id get a response you dont think this would hundred thousand dollar hold up in court i spent time on the task force envelope was there a draft of minutes or instruction to the shoerns on those saying there has to be a Court Lawsuit case present to ethics thats not been communicated to the task force or communicated to complainants when we make a complaint i have several overwhelming unanimous decisions get figuratively gotten away what is your criteria and not