do those specific words create specific legal jeopardy for donald trump? i m john berman with brianna keilar, and judge bruce reinhart released several procedural court documents used to justify the search of mar-a-lago, providing new details and maybe a sharper focus on the president himself as a potential subject of a criminal probe. this is the document that was released and there is specific information in here about willful retention. in other words, they say he knew he had documents and he knew what they were. so this is all part of the argument over whether to release the affidavit justifying the search of mar-a-lago, prosecutors made the case for secrecy because they say evidence might be destroyed, but the judge set in motion the possibility of releasing a redacted version of the affidavit and that process will kick into gear as soon as next week. and ludicrous, ridiculous, bs, those words and phrases coming from some former trump senior officials who are scoffing
documents were missing, requesting those documents. people in trump s camp saying, okay, we ve got a few documents, here you go. that s all the documents. but it wasn t. and so here we have the federal government, department of justice, having to subpoena information and then of course now we know issuing a warrant to search the president s residence. he s just saying no, i m not going to turn this over. yes, i know what they are, yes, i know that you want them. no, i m not turning them over. that s the gist of this charge. as a prosecutor you don t shoot for the highest possible statute, you don t have to go right to the james bond stuff if there is an easier way to get there and this the description of the crime that we now see in this document willful retention of national defense information that s the easiest way to prove t that s smart strategy. willful just means knowing what you re doing and understanding the illegal nature of it here. another important point, though, the
option, a government-run option, traditional medicare as we know it. but it also has an option for private insurance. so if you get your insurance through your employer or your employer decides to offer, it you could stay with the private insurance. but it would be regulated by the federal government. the harris plan envisions it would look for medicare advantage which is something about a third of medicare enrollies take part in. it is different from sanders in that senator sanders wants to eliminate all private insurance. so how would she pay for it. she said she would not tax households that make less than $100,000. it is a progressive tax that starts once you hit over $100,000 in your tax plan, in your household income. again different from bernie sanders because he would start his tax at $29,000. so the criticism started right away. the opposition. the bernie sanders camp saying, quote, you can t call this medicare for all. joe biden s team saying, quote, this looks like they re t
he told me out of his own mouth that she was there at his place, called over by him, although he star 67 d the number and disguised who he was for her to take a photo for auto trader. so she didn t want to go back but she wanted to keep her job. so she wept whack bo take the picture. the last time she s alive. possibly the most important is her bones, her charred bones, found intertwined in steel belts of tires out behind his auto salvage lot. i m hearing all the details and the facts. you talk about bias, and then you have the other camp saying, hang on, the avery family think the small town cops in man i toke county had a bias against him. the county was about to pay a ton of money for his wrongful