Monitoring progress and maim missing displacement all very, very important things particularly when you start to hear them together their entering independent when you look at the consequences. And spelling out the protection of the latino culture district as the main goal reflecting on all the others is significant and lastly talking about pdr protection is specific targets as well as requiring rapid resolution and talking about potentially looking at zoning ive laid auto a game board that is tangible and focused and inches into action. Commissioner Vice President richards. I echo what commissioner moore used i use the word speech also ill blown away a great body of work i congratulate the staff and communities several thoughts i have here on page 7 of the presentation the thing that blew me uaw marketrate are contributing to the marketrate they are part of solution thats a huge shift in that philosophy and wrap our arms around i agree with the director we dont want to kill the gotten
Aau is above the law the Department Needs to restore Public Confidence beyond why the Planning Department of rebating permit violations exists the aau we all know their unlivable to change their predatory and callous practices of land use violations it is disturbing to me as to why the department is not activate the City Attorney and use the recommendations under the planning code in section 17 of one can only speculate why it is a matter of principle and justice thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Im going to be using the overhead im not going to start until he sets it back at 3 pardon me. Im ready. My name is sieving ive been dealing with this case for 14 years on the overhead is the map that was the eir academy of arts red is housing the blue is Institutional Uses was the first map all im asking for the Planning Commission to take the opportunity to reset the hearing informational hearing with the ability for the public to give input on the report you got last friday or thus
Size the bar should be to have 10 games in it . Have you thought about that . Can a bar be a 49 occupancy and have 10 or nine games in it . What have you determined on that . Those are calculations that are pretty well handled by other aspects of San Francisco code, the building code, the code and the Entertainment Commission doesnt seem like the place to litigate that and we met with them on this and there are other tools in the tool box to address that. So to staff does the Planning Department have in ttion code a process to disallow a certain number of video games or any games for that matter and say a 49 occupancy . I dont think its about occupancy necessarily. Its about the Square Footage and there is a table in the planning code. There is. I am certainly there is and you know how the planning code works. Its variable but i believe its addressed and in addition obviously as you know if somebody doesnt have a area footage its a fire hazard if something is wlok blocking the door. Th
Of the unit i was doing measurements and was able to gather that the sound was escaping directly from the roof which is why i think its misleading to be taking readings from the front, the side and things are coming up from the roof and right into residents houses. On that particular evening as far as taking measurements when things werent loud enough to get any kind of reading, but it was audible. I have a few more questions. I saw some complaints about a generator in here. Where is the generator located . Some neighbors complained. I think old complaints okay. Mechanical bull is not an issue . No. Not anymore. Okay. And then im hearing youre saying that the door is always closed . Okay. A quick comment. Yeah. I think commissioner akers mentioned earlier as far as bands in front of the building and having a monitor on the bands during load in. In my experience there are two bands in any evening night and the load in process for the change over could be managed much better. During this
Or is this set in stone . Thats a good question. That is a good question. I think this is very limiting but i think there is a reason its very limiting and so i would like to say in three months that they could come back to commission and see how far that they have gone if that is okay because if they knuckle down for three months then i think they should be able to continue to operate and have some of the restrictions lifted depending on which ones are followed correctly. Maybe add one more. Okay. Sound checks outside. Can we require that at all . Just random checks in the neighborhood . From our staff or from them . From them, self managing. Yes. Just a point of order and i do this every time you have these conversations. As commissioners can impose almost anything you want but if its hard or impossible for staff to enforce the knsz they dont amount to much so i rather you think how to phrase the conditions such a way were capable of checking whether they are in violation or not. So