Facebook executives has been meeting with advertisers and Mark Zuckerberg has agreed to meet with civil rights leaders to hear their concerns. But he has had such meetings before. Will another meeting change anything . Joining us is the color of change Vice President , part of the folks who have been pushing the stop hate for profit campaign. Thank you for joining us. Were hearing that zuckerberg has agreed to meet with folks like yourself to try to hear you out. What are you expecting to hear from him, given that you have met with him before and his position has not necessarily changed . Thank you for having me. We are hopeful that in a meeting with Mark Zuckerberg, he will finally hear our real concerns about how the platform is operating. We have obviously been in conversations with the corporation for years, and our demands remain the same, but we are hoping that in light of this new pressure from corporate advertisers from across the globe that he will actually hear demands for a
With civil Rights Groups today to address the growing boycott the organizers of stop hate for profit calling the meeting a disappointment saying that Mark Zuckerberg and Cheryl Sandberg are not ready to address the hate on that platform and did not respond to demands of dozens of its largest advertisers the ncaa color of change, Antidefamation League and free press saying Mark Zuckerberg did not offer any tangible plans on how facebook will address the rampant discrimination and violent conspiracies on their platform the meeting that we just left was a disappointment facebook has had our demands in multiple ways and they showed up to the meeting expect an a for atte attending. Attending alone is not enough. Civil Rights Groups saying facebook did not address their list of demands, saying zuckerberg offered no automatic recourse for advertisers whose consent runs alongside hateful posts. They did not address why facebook recommends hateful groups and didnt address rampant disinformation
Plus, tesla, speeding off to, yes, another record high today what the company said about demand that sent shares into overdrive. Later on, break out the sparklers. Were ushering in the fourth of july with some allamerican stock picks. We will start with 4. 8 million reasons to rally thats because thats how many jobs america created for the economy last month, blowing away economist expectations wall street rallied on the report with the s p 500 finishing the day up about. 5 Something Interesting happened in the market today that we dont often see. We had stocks up, bonds up, the u. S. Dollar up, gold up. So, tim, whats up with todays Market Action . Ill talk about what stocks need to move higher. The macro, again, its not necessarily something to do cartwheels in absolute terms, but in relative terms to where we are, weve taken back onethird of jobs lost we had pmis around the world better this week, housing numbers that were better bonds should be slightly selling off here except for
What people now refer to as the liberal consensus, the 1940s and 1950s, and trying to work through what actually is happening in terms of the kind of main thoroughfare of american politics, the possibilities for Political Action and the way that people are thinking about politics in america in the 40s and 50s. You also had three readings, all of which in different ways deal with the kind of idea of political ideology and all of which share a set of assumptions about the way that ideas matter to politics. So, well sort of be thinking today about how they kind of frame those ideas, and this is a kind of transition class where we move from kind of discussing the geopolitics of the cold war and the red scare into discussioning sort of what else is happening in america in the 1940s and 1950s. So, shall we start with daniel bell . Everybodys favorite reading from today . I assume there were very few questions about this one . Yeah. So, is he essentially saying th that, like the political ide
Roll out some responses to Chinas Hong Kong law as the showdown with twitter gets escalated around the minneapolis protests oil near 33, the focus is squarely on twitter and this rule violation that the president s account got slapped with, and then the white house account, the official white house account retweets were all kind of confused, as marc benioff, who is against this obscure regulation that gives these companies an exception todo this, many are confused it seems President Trump wants to create his own enemy with if you start regulating these Companies Rather than having the exception, theyre always going to have to put a counter to what President Trump wants. I think what he may not understand is free speech is nasty. What he had until this was a great run of things. Its going to make it tough for him to be aggressive on twitter. He doesnt have press conferences that work because of all the displeasure he had with regular reporters. Hes disintermediating himself from the pub