for impeachment now exist in the world and cannot be unrung. correct. that he is a solitary figure is a sad commentary on the republicans. but it does say that this is no longer purely a partisan affair. and moreover, i think what he did, laying out the step-by-step analysis for why there is obstruction of justice is the most effective thing any member of congress has done to explain this to the american people. why the house democrats have been so incapable of breaking this down, i don t know, with charts or, you know, short phrases, i don t know. but he was able to do it in a thread on twitter. and for the life of me, i can t understand why they find it so difficult to tell the story, which is what they re really attempting to do by calling mcgahn, by calling barr and others. kurt, this is such an obvious a question with such an obvious answer.
the congress role and that he thought that congress would take it up on their own initiative and he therefore is no longer needed as a witness, they can do all of it themselves. that that would involve calling mcgahn, priebus, all of the people that gave him testimony to flush out whether or not it is an impeachable offense. but i think mueller s thinking is but you don t need me. my evidence is presented to you. i have given this to you. so that we can inquire of it and i expect you to inquire of it and i m disappointed in you if you do not inquire of it. but you don t need words out of my mouth. that is my surmise as to what he is thinking. okay. i want to jump ahead with you on impeachment. i m curious of your thoughts. let s play this forward. and the house is still divided among the nancy pelosi democrats who she s saying let s just wait and let it go through the courts
the adjective bipartisan calls for impeachment now exist in the world and cannot be unrung. correct. that he is a solitary figure is a sad commentary on the republicans. but it does say that this is no longer purely a partisan affair. and moreover, i think what he did, laying out the step-by-step analysis for why there is obstruction of justice is the most effective thing any member of congress has done to explain this to the american people. why the house democrats have been so incapable of breaking this down, i don t know, with charts or, you know, short phrases, i don t know. but he was able to do it in a thread on twitter. and for the life of me, i can t understand why they find it so difficult to tell the story, which is what they re really attempting to do by calling mcgahn, by calling barr and others. kurt, this is such an obvious