well done! the calories on their own aren t going to make that much of a difference. i think you need to know what else is in there, don t you? even your vegetables are like, braised in butter or oils, just so they glisten under the light. thinking about the fibre content, the protein, the things that obviously fill you up, rather thanjust a number next to a dish. because obviously that can just be kind of misleading in terms of actually what s inside that food itself. the governments in scotland and wales are consulting on whether to introduce similar regulations, but the big question is what impact these measures will have in the fight against rising obesity levels. dominic hughes bbc news. ed sheeran has won his legal battle over claims part of his track shape of you was copied from a song by another artist. the grime artist sami chokri who performs under the name sami switch had accused him of ripping off his track, oh why. but the high court ruled ed sheeran
speed was indicative of copying. # oh i oh i oh i oh i. # i m in love with your body. #. the star and his co writers, johnny mcdaid and steve mack, denied ever having heard the song. their lawyer said the speed of the writing only indicated sheeran s genius. the issue of whether sheeran had access to a copy of why was the key to the trial. if he was unaware of mr chokri s song, the similarities in shape of you would be a coincidence, not copyright infringement. on the witness stand it was put to the star that he must have been aware of mr chokri s work because they both had videos on the same youtube channel, they shared friends, and because mr chokri had messaged sheeran on twitter. in response, the star said, this is all stuff that you re saying. this isn t stuff that s true. the trial lasted for three weeks at the beginning of march. ed sheeran, who launched the proceedings in an attempt to clear his name, attended court
# oh i oh i oh i oh i. # i m in love with your body. #. ..from a song called oh why by the grime artist sami chokri. lawyers for mr chokri, seen here on the left, called sheeran a magpie who borrows ideas that he doesn t always acknowledge. in court, andrew sutcliffe qc said, my clients are not shaggy, rihanna, coldplay or jay z. if they were, they would have been treated in a very different way. mr sheeran denied this and said he always credits lesser known writers if he uses parts of their songs. # the club isn t the best place to find a lover, so the bar is where i go. # me and my friends sat at the table doing shots, drinking, fussing and we talk slow. #. the court heard how shape of you was written in under an hour in october 2016. lawyers for mr chokri said such
mr sheeran denied this and said he always credits lesser known writers if he uses parts of their songs. # the club isn t the best place to find a lover, so the bar is where i go. # me and my friends sat at the table doing shots, drinking, fussing and we talk slow.# the court heard how shape of you was written in under an hour in october 2016. lawyers for mr chokri said such speed was indicative of copying. # oh i oh i oh i oh i. # i m in love with your body.# the star and his co writers, johnny mcdaid and steve mack, denied ever having heard the song. their lawyer said the speed of the writing only indicated sheeran s genius. the issue of whether sheeran had access to a copy of why access to a copy oh why was the key to the trial. if he was unaware of mr chokri s song, the similarities in shape of you would be a coincidence, not
mark savage, bbc news. # ..something brand new. # i m in love with the shape of you. the shape of you.# joining me now is kate swaine, head of intellectual property at gowling law firm. thank you forjoining us. how many vexatious claims are there of this nature? that is what ed was implying? nature? that is what ed was im-alin? . ., , ., nature? that is what ed was im-alin? . . , ., , implying? there certainly have been an u tick. implying? there certainly have been an uptick. high-profile implying? there certainly have been an uptick. high-profile copyright - an uptick. high profile copyright infringement allegations over the last few years against taylor swift, there is the case against katy perry. and there s been an uptick in recent times. perry. and there s been an uptick in recent times- recent times. how difficult is it to rove recent times. how difficult is it to prove plagiarism recent times. how difficult is it to prove plagiarism of recent times. how difficult is it t