the next several days on the committee itself? well, it doesn t have to be that way. what s interesting is that all of the fire coming from the republicans is about process. you haven t heard anyone dispute the facts, and i tried to lay that out yesterday. you ll see that tomorrow and thursday, which is that there are about 12 key facts here that are just absolutely not in dispute. they re acts of the president. and, yes, there may be times where we don t know what the president is saying. in the history of crimes like this, no one has ever said, i m going to commit this crime, and i m going to do it in this way. but the acts of the president show that he used your taxpayer dollars, his office to ask a foreign government to cheat an election that would benefit him. you said obviously how each member votes is personal. i just want to go back to that. are you at all worried that more than just a handful of democrats might pull back and actually not vote for impeachment? actually, a
at&t for call record, is that correct? are we wondering? yes, we are. there are multiple numbers. we only issue subpoenas for call record for peopleoe involved in theed investigation and who had subpoenaed by thewh committee f testimonies of their own. absolutely would feel. answer my question. well, i am trying to answer your question. was it at least fourth? yes. thank you. could have saved a lot of time there. can you check your record? weou just found out about this over the unweekend. we got a massive documents dumped over the weekend. for all of you writing report about it, all that massive documents dumped this is
call records can be powerful sirc stapgsal evidence. in this case it happened people who were involved in president trump s scheme were communicating with the president s lawyer who was also involved in the scheme, a journalist, a staff member of congress and another member of congress. we, of course, did not at all seek in any way, shape, or form to do any investigation on anyone, a member of congress or a staff member of congress. it just happened to be that they were in communication with people involved in the president s scheme. and everything i t you did w basically standard operating procedure for a well run investigation? every investigation in ten years that i did probably we got call record for. mr. goldman, did white house counsel g make his view clear about witnesses and evidence requested by thetn investigatin committees and what was that view?th we never heard from the white house counsel other than the letter which basically just said we will not at all cooperate
to get the call logs and then made them public. no member of congress, no staff and no journalist have their call record subpoenaed. devin nunes should have disclosed that before he went after chairman schiff and chairman schiff was a fact witness but all along nunes was part of the president s conspiracy. bill: it makes people wonder who is next? if you don t talk to indicted felons you don t end up on call records. bill: we ll see how it plays out in court. eric swalwell. thank you. talk to you on monday of next week. sandra: update on that situation this morning. an active shooter situation that came to an end with the shooter dead at naval air station pensacola, florida. we re getting word from one of the area hospitals after we
a corrupt country and the president was very interested in corruption. because this statement talks about corruption in general, the initial draft system, the giuliani volcker and he s a ukrainian official, the statement takes it a step further and mentions those two, mentions burrisma, the 2016 election. the same thing the president mentioned on the call. how can you argue it was just a one off when it keeps coming uch over and over and over again. we saw this in am ambassador taylor s testimony where he was saying look, we tried to get a generic anticorruption statement out that would have been consistent with our long-term policy, but that wasn t good enough. they wanted a mention of burisma. one of the few things that was omitted from that initial call record was that actually zelensky said back to trump when he says biden, yes, we will look