Thank you. Volume 2, page 76, correct . Ill leave the answer to our report. So thats a yes . Is it true your investigation did not establish that any members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the russian government in election interference activity, volume 1, page 2. Volume 1, page 73 . Yes. Thank you. Although your Report States collusion is not a specific offense and you said that this morning or a term of our in federal criminal law and experience is, in the colloquial context are collusion and experience essentially synonymous terms. Youre going to have to row peat that for me. Collusion is not a specific offense or a term of art in federal criminal law. Conspiracy is. In the colloquial context, collusion and conspiracy are essentially synonymous terms, correct . No. If no on page 180 of volume 1 of your report you wrote collusion is largely synonymous of conspiracy and that crime is set forth in the general conspiracy statute. You said at your May 29th Press Conf
question. gentleman from florida. director mueller i d like to get back to your findings covering june of 2017. there was a bauchombshell artic that the president of the united states was personally under investigation for obstruction of justice. and you said in your report on page 90, volume 2 and i quote, news of the obstruction investigation prompted the president to call mcgahn and seek to have the special counsel removed, closed quote. and then in your report you wrote about multiple calls from the president to white house counsel don mcgahn. and regarding the second call you wrote and i quote, mcgahn recalled that the president was more direct. saying something like call rob, tell rob mueller has conflicts and can t be the special counsel. mcgahn recalled the president telling him mueller has to go and call me back when you do it. director mueller, did mcgahn understand what the president was ordering him to do?
on what we wrote about those incidents. you wrote in your report at page 85, volume 2, that on saturday, june 27, 2017, don mcgahn called the president at home to have the special counsel removed. now, did the president call don mcgahn more than once that day? i think it was two calls. on page 85 of your report, you wrote, quote, on the first call, mcgahn recalled that the president said something like, quote, you got to do this, you got to call rudd, correct? correct. and your investigation found that don mcgahn was perturbed, to use your words, at the president s request to call rod rosenstein to fire him, is that correct? there was a continuous
report that on page 85, volume 2 on saturday june 17, 2017, the president called mcgahn at home to have the special counsel removed. now, did the president call don mcgahn more than once that day? well i think it was two calls. on page 85 of your report you wrote, quote, on the first call mcgahn recalled that the president said something about, quote, you ve got to do this, you ve got to call rod, correct? yes. and your investigation found that don mcgan was perturbed to use your words by the president s request to call rod ros ros rosenstein to fire him, isn t that correct? there was a continuous involvement of don mcgahn in
correction and mcgahn said no. correct? that s accurate. well, mr. mueller, thank you for your investigation uncovering this very disturbing evidence. my friend mr. richmond will have additional questions on the subject. however it is clear to me if anyone else had ordered a witness to create a false record and cover up acts subject of a law enforcement investigation that person would be facing criminal charges. i yield back my time. the gentleman from ohio. director, the f.b.i. interview joseph miss uday on february 28, 2017. he lied. you point this out an page 133, he also denied and falsely stated. in addition he omitted. three times he lied to the f.b.i. yet you didn t charge him with a crime. why not? did you say 193?