that violence against the former vice president. tonight, committee members olaf comments on the growing danger. and harry litman on the difficulties of prosecuting. and sandra garza on trump s culpability in the death of her partner. officer brian sicknick, all in starts right now. good evening from new york, i m chris hayes. one of the two republican members of the january six committee just offered a stark, personal warning about the threat of political violence in this country. a topic he knows a thing or two about. this threat that came in was mailed to my house. we got it a couple of days ago. it threatens to execute me, as well as my wife and five month old child. i have never seen or had anything like that. there are people, there is violence in the future. i m going to tell, you until we get a grip on telling people the truth, we cannot expect any differently. that is adam kinzinger, illinois. he has been in congress for more than a decade. the vast majority of
chris hayes. one of the two republican members of the january six committee just offered a stark, personal warning about the threat of political violence in this country. a topic he knows a thing or two about. this threat that came in was mailed to my house. we got it a couple of days ago. it threatens to execute me, as well as my wife and five month old child. i have never seen or had anything like that. there are people, there is violence in the future. i m going to tell, you until we get a grip on telling people the truth, we cannot expect any differently. that is adam kinzinger, illinois. he has been in congress for more than a decade. the vast majority of that time he has acted and voted like a conservative republican, which is what he is. he voted in line with donald trump s position, 90% of the time. but after the attempted coup on january six, kings inner was one of ten republicans who voted to impeach trump. and since then he has been essentially ex communicated
when he is inflaming the crowd, as he want, to delay the certification. absolutely, and that doesn t matter if he thinks he won, when he is trying to strong-arm raffensperger. is he trying to do a fraud? absolutely. he could go to court if you want to, but even if he truly believes he won, i don t believe it helps him. so i think here, and most people have come to agree, jacques portrayal of this is a very different call decision. i think it s probably against the grain. i think they ve got intent on him, and everything else is transparent, all the acts et cetera. so i think the evidence is there under the standard inquiry that you played out. and then the final question is not a national interest question. you know, he writes the prosecution takes many years to conclude. it could deeply impact the next election, and the ultimate way to the next administration which, could be headed by mr. trump, which i think is actually an interesting quite important practical consideration.
believe it helps him. so i think here, and most people have come to agree, jack s portrayal of this is a very different call decision. i think it s probably against the grain. i think they ve got intent on him, and everything else is transparent, all the acts et cetera. so i think the evidence is there under the standard inquiry that you played out. and then the final question is not a national interest question. you know, he writes the prosecution takes many years to conclude. it could deeply impact the next election, and the ultimate way to the next administration which, could be headed by mr. trump, which i think is actually an interesting quite important practical consideration. but how do you i mean, there s no like, god look for the national interest question. there really isn t. there is one sort of canonical president. let s nixon and ford. and for a national nightmare and, and i think history vindicates him. but trump has become the anti nixon here. nixon had some sense