Tenants were facing evictions and harassment threats. The crew the tenants are chineseamerican individuals, families and seniors with incomes averaging 30 a. M. I. The next project is 3198 24th street on the corner of south van ness and 24th. It is sponsored by Mission Economic development agency, also in district nine. The project is fully occupied with eight residential units and incomes ranging between 13 a. M. I. And 100 and 5 a. M. I. , with the overall average being 52 . The funding will preserve provide seismic and life safety upgrades and will enable five longstanding Community Businesses to be preserved. Finally, we have 654, street, which upon completion will include seven residential units including five onebedroom, one studio, and a threebedroom unit the construction work remaining includes the conversion of a Carriage House into a onebedroom accessory dwelling unit. Finally, i recommend your approval of the resolution so mohcd can provide the permanent financing to preserv
First of all, youre not going to get first dibs on becoming an owner of equipment of pg e. Pg e owns their Insurance Companies multi quadruple billions of dollars, is that clear . That is why they might want our money . No, the persons in the Insurance Companies get first dibs at the property. The best way to take care of this problem, yall ready you all are ready on the right track, you have to build your own system to distribute your own electricity to the city and county of San Francisco. Get rid of pg e altogether. How many more examples do you need to demonstrate that pg e is not dealing in good faith, and by the same response never had intentions of reaching a legal agreement on this matter. About this contract agreement that you referred to, in may, if that contract was signed by pg e and they made a deal with the city, that is a breach of contract. If they pulled out and did not keep up their end of the bargain, understand me. That is an additional lawsuit that should be filed
Or even im still here. I hope more police and more safety, you know, in our community, all the community, we appreciate it. President hirsch thank you. Next speaker, please. Hi. My name is paula williams, and im homeless in San Francisco right now. Ive been homeless since december of 2018. Ive made Numerous Police reports. Ive been harmed numerous of times by staff in the shelters. The police have did me no justice. Ive went to the city attorney, ive went to the d. P. A. Its just plain corruption. Its five Police Officers that dont want to take a Police Report, made false statements in my Police Report. Didnt want me to file a Police Report and just was lying. I liked when miss taylor said they wanted to take a look at the shelters. Every morning, i walkthrough t. L. And encourage them, tell them to get up, all to its numerous of stuff that whatever hsoc and all of them is talking about, i just called the Police Yesterday in front of walgreens and had the police come up and pick a lady
Youve got inclusionary law where people in the lowincome is supposed to be drunkinclude the housing opportunity, but yet, when you do the documentation, you do not include them. Supervisor walton thank you, mr. Wright. Is there any other Public Comment on item number seven . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Supervisor mar, did you have any questions or statements . Thank you. With that said, i will make a motion to refer to the board of supervisors with positive recommendation. Well take that without objection. At this time, we would like to id like to make a motion to recess until 11 15. Going to give our nominee for item number four an opportunity to get here by 11 15. Supervisor walton back in session. Thank you so much. Mr. Clerk, would you please call item number four. Clerk item number four is the motion approvingrejecting the mayors nomination for ruby bolariashifrin for a term ending february 26, 2022. Supervisor walton thank you so much. Miss bolariashifrin, you have the
Things, reduce the size of one of the front decks, they minimize the elevator penthouse. They have added sound dampening measures along the Property Lines, removed fire pits on the back deck, and as i said, as a result, the north neighbor is in support of the project. They did reach out and work with the south neighbor. She is obviously not on board, that said, the project is currently designed smaller then a current massing diagram that they have provided earlier on in the process. There is that, and in addition to that, or Property Line window is not being covered by the project. It is being sent back 5 feet at the bottom. I cant even remember how much the contact is at the top, but it is not covering the Property Line window. A couple of things i want to say , the existing building on site today is 5,000 square feet. It is proposed to go up to 5500 square feet. The proposed new building to the south is 5,000 square feet. I just want to get that clear and make sure everyone is aware.