prosper outside of the european points. union with or without a brexit that was unheard of. but he was able to go home, talk deal in place. arthel: how does it impact the to his constituents, tell them what he was doing for them in other european union nations? washington, telling them why the well, i think that most e.u. work he was doing was important, but also why the work at the countries are desperate to avoid a no-deal brexit, which is why national level, why the the e.u. made significant investigation into the russian concessions in order to secure interference in our elections was important, not as important this agreement with the united kingdom. it s not in the interests of as making sure he had opioid countries such as germany, for example, to have a no-deal treatment and healthcare funding brexit which could cost a large eric: sorry, we re up against the clock. number of german jobs. i m sorry, that s the problem a lot of times when we do the the germans export about 15
there s another reality, another hearing people are going to see that don t have time to sit and watch 3 1/2 hours of cable tv news and might only see a mash-up of mueller refusing to answer questions or seeming like he s not even familiar with his own report. jim, we re only halfway there. i m sure he s resting up, having lunch. the intelligence committee has a whole bunch of questions for him as well. they do. to focus on that fundamental question of the extent, systematic interference in the election. it was interesting there. you did have one of the republican members raise the question as to whether the troll farms were tied to and operated by the russian government, well establish bid intelligence agencies but also bipartisan committees in both the house and the senate. it will be interesting if you see republicans raising those questions again on the fundamental issue here, the extent of the russian interference, questions that the president has raised, has raised
over the border, and do you think that he knows better? i can t speak to the president s mind. i think that he certainly has lots of advisers capable of providing him with factual and detailed briefings, and here is one of the things that we have heard repeatedly and widely cover ed covered in the administration is how he does not read briefing materials of any depth or detail and he spends a lot more time watching cable tv news than he does reading the intelligence briefings and meeting with his own senior advisers and that concern mes greatl lys me greate job of president is one of the most complex and demanding jobs in the world. and having a government full of seasoned and nonpart san professionals who can advise him on things like national security is so that he can listen. my hunch is that he is choosing to hear more of what is broadcast on a few news outlets than what is provided to him from the professionals from the intelligence community. chris coons of delaware, thank yo
this stuff isn t about brett kavanaugh. when screamers say this stuff for cable tv news. the people who know you better, not those who are trying to get on tv, they tell a completely different story about who brett kavanaugh is. you ve earned high praise from the many lawyers, both right and left, who have appeared before you during your 12 years on the d.c. circuit. and those who have had you as a professor at yale law and harvard law. people in legal circles invariably applaud your mind, your work, your temperament, your collegiality. that s who brett kavanaugh is. and to quote lisa blatt, a supreme court attorney from the left who s known you for a decade, quote, sometimes a superstar is just a superstar, and that s the case with this judge. the senate should confirm him, close quote. it s pretty obvious to most people going about their work today that the deranged comments actually don t have anything to do with you. so we should figure out why do we talk like this about supreme co
kavanaugh. when screamers say it stuff for cable tv news. the people who know you better, not those who are trying to get on tv, they tell a completely different story about who brett kavanaugh is. you ve earn high praise during your 12 years on the d.c. circuit. people in legal circles invariably applaud your mind, your work, your temperament, your collegiately. that s who kavanaugh is. to quote an attorney from the left who s known you for a decade, quote, sometimes the superstar is just a superstar and that s the case with this judge, the senate should confirm him. it s obvious to most people going about their work today that the deranged comments don t have anything to do with you. we should figure out why do we talk like this now. there s a bunch that s atypical in the last 19, 20 months in america. senator klobuchar is right, the