fundamentally there are political issues there and you have politicians themselves speaking about this every day. well, not just politicians, but some of the mouthpieces, you know who i m talking about, that politicians follow. it would be kind offed odd, wouldn t it that you could go to a particular cable outlet and thatter them espoused but you couldn t go on tiktok or twitter and see the same viewpoint. it would be odd. fox news at its own agenda. cnn has its own approach. luckily, i think a lot of mainstream media is trying to do good journalism, they want to do fact check journalism. social platforms are not going to amplify or feed fuel to the fire. they can make it harder to find these videos, manifest toes. four chan is not part of this collaboration. you do see, for example, twitch reacted against the video right away. there are platforms for
had the following to say on this issue. i respect everybody else s decision, i ask that everybody does the same for me. i know that s not the world we live in. not everyone is going to equally view things the same. no one knows what s going on in someone else s household, it s a personal decision. that s where i m at on it. he also spoke of doing his own research, of doing a lot of research. what thoughts do you have? my thought is this, let s ignore every credible organization, every credible individual, the overwhelming near unanimous scientific consensus that the vaccines are not only effective beut that thy are safe and and let s go looking on the internet or on some partisan cable outlet that trucks in, traffics rather in fear and resentment, and doesn t want to tell their audience
he picks a piece of it that works for him and he ignores the rest, which does not. yeah, it s classic. it s classic trump. because he wants to get ahead of it, he wants to set the narrative, he wants to take whatever it is that he can to channel it on his twitter feed, channel it on another cable outlet, channel that takes what he says and uses it as gospel for the people who want to believe everything he says. and the way you laid it out is exactly right. first of all, let s just take a step back and remember who this guy is. the leader of ukraine has been dancing on the head of a pin since he took office. he s got to be careful not to make the united states angry and that the commander in chief happens to be donald trump. he is so in the spotlight right now, he s got to be careful, but he was trying to protect himself and protect the integrity of his actions. it doesn t hurt to remind
defendants, but it s a light sentence. joining us now nic robertson. do you think other folks could bring us up to speed now on what look at this and say we could the saudis are considering. make get off fairly easy here and let s get this over with? it s interesting you say that. because 14 days at what will be a minimum security facility doesn t seem like a great deal. i happen to think that the reporter: the satellite has showed the massive burnoff. serious punishment in all of these cases is taking place right now. it s the fact that we re having when the smoke clears, you can this conversation on an international cable outlet and see these precision strikes one the damage to reputation in my view far exceeds whatever the after another. time will be for any of them. so the precision here and the so michael, also on your show direction of these strikes, it appears to come sfr the this weekend, a discussion that northwest. of course it was the houthis in i m fascinated with whi
else to see, look over here, when the penny s about to drop elsewhere. you think it s because of the manafort news and the sharing the data that he came on and did that? i do. and while i watched last night and i m not the only one to have this recollection, but i was thinking of mayor giuliani on a different cable outlet a long time ago talking about the hush money payoffs and a revelation that he made about a law firm s involvement and the way in which the transaction had been handled was then an eye opener. he got ahead of the curve in that case and maybe he s seeking to protect his client and get ahead of the curve in this case as well. got you. let me turn the page and ask you about what we ve been talking about the last hour or so, this latest tit for tat, latest volley from the president, but it was nancy pelosi who start it had yesterday saying you can t have your state of the union on january 29th. you were on cnn floating the idea the president doing the state of the unio