crystal was gone, and there were lots of reasons to worry. she had numerous lovers, me and women. you had the husband and boyfriend failing polys. on the same day the answer would have t wait hurricane harvey is movin in this direction and high water rescues. we re stuck in the house an immediately went to social media. what kind of things pictures of her and her license plate. someone knew where she was, someone that liked to play games. he thought he was smarter than we were willing to trade one nigh of freedom he said i m ready to talk let me go home and tomorrow morning i ll tell yo everything in exchange for the terribl truth. if he couldn t have her nobody could. crystal was young mom and brought th search for crystal to a halt - then hurricane harvey decimate her texas town and brought the search for krystal to a halt but in a lead investigator forged ahead, uncovering a series of clues and as the floodwaters receded, h discovered the
getting twice as much, basically, as this network another network, competitors so basically all of us a consumers, whether we watch fo or not, i subsidizing tucker carlson. so the question is, for cabl providers, is that we should n longer allow them to continu to allow fox have to have thes high rates we re running a campaign right now to actually focus on that, focus on the verizon s and at& is of the world, we cabl providers that are actuall paying the money because we are all subsidizing tucker carlson, were subsidizing those lives, wer subsidizing that the folks o those networks, and it s not the advertisers. so i can run an advertiser campaign with my team, we ca get all these advertisers to typist, and fox creek doin what it s doing. so corporate accountability wa also about strategy. and so part of the strateg here is focusing on our energy at the right places, so we hav the right results. i knew you d have an answer
campaigns, and the busines model was different fox. but the business model over th years was slowly changed and so fox actually doesn actually need advertisers. in fact, about 90% of th resources have been throug cable subscriptions. and what ends up happening i they negotiate a much higher sort of iffy - carriage fees. so what ends up happening is w getting twice as much, basically, as this network another network, competitors so basically all of us a consumers, whether we watch fo or not, i subsidizing tucker carlson. so the question is, for cabl providers, is that we should n longer allow them to continu to allow fox have to have thes high rates we re running a campaign right now to actually focus on that, focus on the verizon s and at& is of the world, we cabl providers that are actuall
all of his advertisers, fo news had a sort of shift i their business model, and they did not want to be a commercia tv channel that was beholden t what was commercially viable what advertisers wanted. they leverage their audience t call their cable companies all the time, they lie to thei companies, they said uk become is about to take fox news away from, you they are censoring us, they have a liberal agenda, yo had better call. and basically for the last decade fox news has been getting their audience t increase everybody in th country s cable rates by artificially inflating the demand for fox news. this has nothing to do wit viewership, it has everythin to do with the sort of energ that - and if they lose this trial if they lose this case that going to affect those surely oh without a doubt. the negotiations are happening this month the same time that they re going to be in court, the cabl companies going have to decide whether or not they want t give fox news significantl more
the grace of god, and you have no right to keep having th term after term after term trade stations do not hav fcc licenses, that is no networking, that is a cabl stations he has both these are big questions we will get answers. bob, thank you to see you. matthew dowd, great great to see you. i wish you were here in person when we come back, there is on story that needs to be spoke about. an american journalist has now been in russian custody for total of seven days. the question how is the u.s. government going to get this guy home when the 11th hour continues weeds. they have you surrounded. you re just gonna stand there? or are ya gonna take your lawn back.