day two of oral arguments for what s called a summary judgment hearing in the $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against fox brought by dominion voting system. ñ to begin in less than ag executivesçó alike knew claims about election fraud were fake. but that the netwoj went+■r 9g aired them any t(e1a5a.■way, defamation. in response, fox5a■ asserted th after a ñrreview of these
transcripts, the judge appeared more skeptical of arguments made by fox thandominion. notab$y (u+q) to admit w3something. are wee1 going to the jury tha dominion committed election fraud byñi rigging thee1lplpe1 election fraud? if notion, i need to know from you whatxd evidence that you have tt dominion rigged the 2020q are you going to present any evidence6z■ offá that? the response from fox st(t( ñrl we are notx#qq#endingw3i]t( onn allegation are true.ñiznñ joining usok conversation, president of media matters,xd b first, ■iandrew, likec içójfçóñ wish i would have gone to law ì% did i get the contours of the case right? what it is fundamentally that they are trying to argue?