The Democratic National committee is wrapping up its today. N washington, d. C. We will show you what happened during the meeting earlier today, which began with an audience member expressing her disappointment with the commission process. I came all the way from california to be here. I may have to leave in the middle of this. Thate that Going Forward the process we are undertaking here, including ourselves as participants, i profess being very disappointed with the outreach regarding this meeting. As one of many people [indiscernible] we finally received an email less than 48 hours before this meeting started to inform us and nobody has ever gotten back to me. Now that these recommendations are going to the rules committee, i would hope that we would improve upon the image that is out there now all over social media being talked about. For all the talk about wanting to reform and make this party or transparent, the exact opposite has happened. Im one of the coauthors of this autopsy
Those delegates who are in category three will be allocated similar to category two as follows. The dnc would announce the noegation of category three later than five days after the last nominating contest the allocated the pledged delegates. If there are insufficient in category three candidates, alternate delegates would be elevated to provide the needed president ial preferences. Once the dnc has achieved the requisite number of supporters for each candidate, the dnc seven collect a written president ial preference from each candidate and delegate as applicable. The dnc shall make public the identity of each category three delegate and any alternates as applicable, and the candidate for which they have submitted a president ial preference. If the states chair or the dnc determines there is still an insufficient number of category two or three delegates respectively, supporting candidates proportionately, after attending to allocate alternate delegates, the states whichdnc will deter
I hope that going forward, the process is improved upon. The outreach regarding this meeting, i was one of many was cced on the meetings and nobody ever got back to us. I understand the language of inclusive the and participation. We finally received an email ,ess than 24 hours before nobody ever got back to me or anyone i know about the meeting. The policy of cracking what we preach. Now these recommendations are going to be going to the rules committee, and i would hope that we could improve upon the image of, sorry to say, it is out there all over social media, it is being talked about. From the talk of wanting to improve performance and make the party more transparent, the exact opposite is happening. Another case in point, i am one of the coauthors of the autopsy report. Put a summary. Time, wet asking for are simply tried to make is available to committee members, as if wewice it was were passing on something offensive. We are loyal democratic members. Im a party officer, i am an
I came all the way from california to be here. I am sorry. I may have to leave in the middle of this but i do want to say, i certainly hope that Going Forward that this caucus that were all part of undertaking here, including ourselves as participants, is improved upon. I profess being very disappointed with the out reach regarding this meeting. I was one of many people im rsvpd to the meeting and no one got back us to. I understand all the language about participation and ncluesivity but sadly [indiscernible] as a case in point we finally received an email less than 48 hours before meeting started to inform us and no one has ever gotten back to me or anyone to that i know that rsvpd the meeting. Now that these recommendations are going to be going to the rules committee, i would hope that we can approve improve upon the image of, sorry to say, that is out there now all over social media being talked about. This is for all the talk about wanting to improve and reform and make this part
Ok, we are Getting Started whether youre sitting or not. Thank you for a much. We are going to be moving to the amendments that were tabled yesterday. We are going to start basically in the order they are in the document. The first ones we will discuss are in the unpledged section, specifically in reference to number five, recommendation number five. I first ask if there are no objections, i would like to take this off the table, the discussion. I see no objections. Can we please put this up on the screen . Focused one recommendation number five, under the unpledged section, because of some of the work that is done, there are some adjustments to recommendations number four, which was passed yesterday. Sk that we consider number i ask that as we consider number consider adjustments to number four and we will vote on a combination of the two. We will move forward and highlight the adjustments here. All right. Ok. I will just read through this quickly. You can paraphrase, you dont have to