and that he dreamt of seeing her: the article was soon deleted, with jeremy clarkson saying he was horrified to have caused so much hurt. the sun also said they regretted publishing the article, and six months on, the paper is now publishing a ruling from its regulator, ipso, that it breached the editorial code. will there be a fine for the sun? the remedy that the committee required is the publication of its upheld decision, to let not only the readers of the sun but also the wider public know about the reasons for the finding, and the sun will be required to flag that on its front page. the complaint was not made by the duchess of sussex, but by the women s rights organisationsd the wilde foundation and the fawcett society, who have welcomed the ruling. we re absolutely delighted about this victory for fawcett, for our members and supporters, and also for wilde foundation who also brought the complaint with us. this was a really egregious example,
a column byjeremy clarkson in the sun in which he wrote about the duchess of sussex being paraded naked in the street has had a complaint of sexism upheld by the press watchdog. a record 25,000 people complained to the independent press standards 0rganisation about the article. david sillito reports. jeremy clarkson s column from december of last year was all about how much he hated the duchess of sussex, and that he dreamt of seeing her: the article was soon deleted, with jeremy clarkson saying he was horrified to have caused so much hurt. the sun said they also regretted publishing the article, and six months on, the paper is now publishing a ruling from its regulator, ipsa, to bridge the editorial code. will there be a fine for the sun? the editorial code. will there be a fine for the sun? for the sun? the remedy that is reuuired for the sun? the remedy that is required as for the sun? the remedy that is required as the for the sun? the remedy that is required as the public
for the finding, and the sun will be required to flag fat on its front page. required to flag fat on its front nae. required to flag fat on its front nae, . ., , ., required to flag fat on its front nae. h, required to flag fat on its front mae. ,., ., required to flag fat on its front page. the complaint was not made by the duchess page. the complaint was not made by the duchess of page. the complaint was not made by the duchess of sussex, page. the complaint was not made by the duchess of sussex, but page. the complaint was not made by the duchess of sussex, but by - page. the complaint was not made by the duchess of sussex, but by the - the duchess of sussex, but by the women s rights organisation wild foundation and the force of society, who have welcomed the ruling. there we are absolutely delighted about this for very, fawcett, for our members and supporters, and for wild foundation who also brought the complaint with us. this was a really egregious example, women have