and have changed those laws. they are making the democracy work. ensuring values and priorities are reflected in the laws we pass. thank you, congressman. let me give 30 seconds to senator klobuchar. iron change, i m curious. gun confiscation. if the government is buying back, how do you not have that conversation? that s not confiscation. you give the offer. i ll say this, i look at the proposals and say does it hurt my uncle and his beer stand. coming from a hunting and fishing. these proposals don t do that. i was in the senate i saw the moms from sandy hook come and try to advocate for change. we all failed. and then now the parkland kids from florida. they started a literally a national shift. you know why? it s like with gay marriage. when kids talk to parents they say i done understand why we
now about what s happened. so you wrote an op-ed about gun control in new zealand in the herald calling for two major changes, banning semiautomatics and a national regular to start tracking who owns guns. a register would cost about $30 million. apparently that s too expensive. but how much would you pay to undo friday s attack? is that what the prime minister will be grappling with as she meets with other leaders? yeah. it is a combination of two things. it is the money. it is extremely expensive. i mean, $30 million to set up a register is not a lot of money really, but it is an excuse that s being used. buying back in order to ban your assault rifles, you know, you need to be able to buy them back. and that will cost millions and millions and millions of dollars. we re talking hundreds of
disadvantage, who is at an advantage, you had a news entity that normally would have been all over a candidate like donald trump, but was standing down because of this very strange and apparently deep as these things go in trump world friendship between donald trump and david pecker. talk about fake news. it s always projection with him. now, that is fake news. yes. it is always projection. that s not fake, but it s always him buying back the secrets or whatever and controlling the news narrative in that way. that s the terrible part of the news, something that the mainstream media doesn t do. but he always says that, you know, he always projects that on to us. but getting to that, speaking of mainstream media and cnn. this corroborates those tapes, remember those tapes we had on last month? yes. cohen apparently secretly recorded discussing buying back watch this and then we ll talk about it. i need to open up a company for the transfer of all of that info regarding our
yes. it is always projection. that s not fake, but it s always him buying back the secrets or whatever and controlling the news narrative in that way. that s the terrible part of the news, something that the mainstream media doesn t do. but he always says that, you know, he always projects that on to us. but getting to that, speaking of mainstream media and cnn. this corroborates those tapes, remember those tapes we had on last month? yes. cohen apparently secretly recorded discussing buying back watch this and then we ll talk about it. i need to open up a company for the transfer of all of that info regarding our friend, david, you know, so that i m going to do that right away. i ve actually come up leave it to me and i ve spoken to allen weisselberg about how to set the whole thing up with so what are we going to funding yes. and it s all the stuff, all the stuff. because, you know, you never know where that company, you
of what s in there and why the trump team seems to like it, renato. here s what they say that you need to combat for the purposes of our discussion tonight. the transcript makes it clear that trump is finding out about this after the fact. so he didn t set it up. the transcript makes clear that he was thinking about buying back what ami, the parent company of the national enquirer, had through a legitimate corporate entity. so it shows it s not a campaign violation. and there is no proof that he ever paid back david pecker even though they have a conversation about it in here, which proves he wasn t paying pecker back, which means pecker wasn t doing a donation for him to help his campaign. assess. well, it s hard to know in a vacuum. but i would say is this clearly shows at some point in the process he was aware of the payment. the question is when was he aware, and what did he do at that point? so it s really hard to say from one limited conversation. it strikes me that this is,