the main claim in this case was that their client was not allowed to even advertise her business making wedding websites, which did not exist, so there is a business, it doesn t exist, she s not allowed to advertise that business and they said alleged by because of an anti-discrimination law and then in the midst of that, they bring this inquiry from a same-sex couple. they re trying to say this doesn t matter, we brought this on bigger grounds but two things to know about that. the much bigger grounds are actually even more imaginary than this inquiry that is possible. she has yet to advertise for this service. and they re saying it is a preenforcement challenge and yes, and they exist, and so this is something that was meant to affirm the religious rights of this woman, lori smith and people like her at the expanse of queer and trans feel.