A strategic break from the more modest policies of bushs predisaster. I believe it represented a recognition that we would never succeed against the terrorists if we went after them one at a time and as long as governments were facilitating the Organization Training equipping and financing of terrorist organizations we were never going to get it under control. And Ambitious Program for all out war a goal in line with neo conservative policy and thinking an approach supported by Richard Powell. Dick Cheney Donald Rumsfeld congolese or rice Paul Wolfowitz Douglas Feith these are the advisors who have bushs. Joe wilson a career diplomat witnessed the rice. They came into office with the Republican Party and particular with. The staffing done by the Vice President and his office and the secretary of defense and his office. Referred to as conservatives they have ties to the world of oil to the Defense Industry they are strong proponents of American Global domination. Saddam hussein softened
Minister tells e. U. Leaders and only meet them if they change their position on bricks at. And there were seen some pretty violent storms across the some portions of europe and im afraid to say that we could well see a few more yet you can see all this chatter on the satellite that is containing some scattered showers and thunderstorms a good season strong winds in there and also have a system here working its way into the southwest of the u. K. And that could also bring with it not only some rain but also some potentially strong thunderstorms at times so this is the picture on cheese day at temperatures not too bad 26 in paris 29 in syria he can see where the rain in the clouds will be so it should be not too bad in paris maybe just increase in the cat as the day goes on but really the bulk of the rains are going to be called seasonal central and eastern sections and youll notice the temperature in moscow this temperature is actually set to decline even further over the next few days
His exercise to block from that account is in ability he shares in common with all twitter users. In holding that this was a First Amendment violation, the District Court made to critical errors. The District Court incorrectly concluded that donald trump was wielding the power of the federal government when he blocked plaintiffs from the account. Second, the court incorrectly concluded that the account was a forum from which plaintiffs are being excluded. Are you arguing that the only thing independent of his presidency in the account is his blocking or the account itself . Are you maintaining that position or just the blocking . When you are trying to analyze whether or not state action is being evoked, you look at the particular conduct at issue. You ask whether the particular conduct at issue is wielding the power of the government, whether privilege orr Authority Given to the defendant by virtue of their office. This twitter account is a designated public forum then . Is it a publi
Captioning performed by vitac in order to speak into that larger private forum. The discussions arent happening specifically on realdonaldtrump, theyre happening across twitter in response to things that he has said. And the best example i can give of this is that the replies themselves arent necessarily hosted on realdonaldtrump. If he were to delete a tweet, for example, the things that people have said directly to him would exist elsewhere. You could see them on the accounts that were on the account of the twitter of the individual account owner who had replied. They exist on a tab that says tweets and replies. So really these comment threads under realdonaldtrump are better seen as sort of a record of conversations that are happening across twitter. So when donald trump blocks someone, hes not keeping them from these conversations, hes not keeping them but hes making it much more difficult for them to access his tweets, though, isnt he . There are ways to go around this, with shado
The United Nations General Assembly has voted by a huge majority to declare u. S. Recognition of jerusalem as israels capital knol and void all in all a hundred twenty eight voted for the resolution with just nine against and thirty five abstentions countries who sided with america were israel guatemala honduras the Marshall Islands micronesia now roup palau and togo mike hanna has more now from the United Nations. On the face of it its a sweeping repudiation of President Trump and his policies the two thirds majority easily achieved in the General Assembly but its instructive to look back at a similar vote on jerusalem that was taken in november there were six votes against now nine togo on tourists and guatemala joining the notions who voted against that last vote in terms of abstentions even greater difference then there were six abstentions of this occasion there were thirty five so it does appear that the threats of president trying to cut off Financial Aid did have some kind of i