from washington. tonight, the flimflam gang. the that s the focus of tonight s angle. all right. the talking point this year for globalists is that conservatives skeptical about the mcconnell schumer border servativ deal don t really wanta to solve the crisis. they re just bowing down to donalhuck schd, who opposes it s not surprising, i guess, but it s it s i mean, it s deeply. people are dying and people s lot you know, there are a lot of people s lives are in the balance here. i think that s a fundamental problem with trumpism. right. if i think is about nihilism, ie burn it down caucus. r they right. d they don t want to legislate n is solvingproblems problems. right? they don t want the government to wort thk similar flimsy thing coming from conservative stalwart mitt romney, another of trumpthin loathing pro-amnesy republicans like thom tillis. it is immoral for me to say you look the other way because . you think this is the linchpin for president trump to
morning joe: weekend. it was another monumental week of news, and here are some of the key conversations that you might have missed. despite donald trump s win in new hampshire s republican primary on tuesday, and it s simple suggests major problems i had for donald trump if he goes on to the general election. according to analysis by fox news, 39% of gop voters in the granite state says that they will not vote for trump if he was the nominee in november. assembler question was asked of nikki haley for the voters in new hampshire. 94% on cnn. they would be dissatisfied if trump wins a nomination. among that same group, 83% said they would consider trump unfit for office if he is convicted of a crime by election day. it s crazy, i, mean he is talking about terminating abortion, terminating roe v. wade. the poll there showed that that issue also weighed heavily on the lines of new hampshire voters and so there you have 66%. george conway, so, you know. even before the democra
maybe someone could explain this. if you can t get it jant. but here s the thing, the way i understand it if you are the baker, the photographer, if you are that pizza place or the caterer that doesn t want to because of your religion serve a same-sex wedding, you now are in violation. you have to wonder though and i don t know the punishment but you re in violation. when the governor was here, would he support a separate bill that didn t in fact infringe upon religious freedom, and he said he had not taken that position before. he would consider it instead he got in and muddied up this one law and people are sick of it. i would love to ask the burn it down caucus, hillary clinton or harry reid, all the people dismissing these christians as bigots. what is the punishment specifically for someone who refuses a gay wedding. what should we do to that person? remember it helps people have their day in court who said, i have a right to wear