Fact that from what i heard and what is in the major proposal and that kind of pulls back to maras question on retail and small business. Another concern that i think uc should pull up and i say this because once again, my sophomore year in college i worked at uc in the langleyporter institute that had to do with aging its coming back. And health, i thought. Yes, i remember. What i found is that the project that we did was at that point in the fillmore and the reality was that we were looking at certain things that were causing a negative view on minorities at that time it was majority black so my reality as i looked in the bayview and look at other communities, if there was a way in which some of this property could go towards what i call support services. That would deal with the needs of the community and if they need help, now you have got ucsf right there, with the facilities and the professionalism to be able to help them directly. Because one of the things that i am pushing in t
Yeah. Lets go back to items 7 through 11 right. Let me try to restart that discussion. I want to appreciate number one up want to appreciate the staff from supervisor avalos office beth and supervisor kims office and sunny and my office jen that has been working on the amending of the legislation to basically improve the language and strengthen the los angeles as we move forward. Since we know that we are reilly wanting to do it right for 26 years before it sunset again. And this is our opportunity to make sure we have this strongest possible legislation for voters to vote pr on. And for the consensus piece that we have been working on in terms of amending and thank you tom owen for all the amendments weve asked him and he got it to us so again, the amendments really are to more focused on the Childrens Fund piece of this. And even that much is to strengthen the language to clarify a few of the items. There wasnt any major differences in terms of what we wanted from the legislation the