burned down. but that s only one way to deal with this. so, am i correct, is it your view that there are other, perhaps, more effective ways since obamacare is in a collapse, to make sure people with these pre-existing chronic conditions get the health care that they need at an affordable price without necessarily having the guaranteed issued mandate? i think it s important to understand the position we currently find ourselves in with policy and this nation is that those folks are in a very short period of time are going to have nothing because of the because of the collapse of the market. right. second topic is i think you and i share a goal of having health care that is much, much more driven by individuals, families, patients, consumers, consumer-centric rather than bureaucratic-centric, which is what obamacare is. do you agree with me that to get there, we need to do more about
in the industrialized world has to settle for. why should they pay out of pocket month after month after month to pay for something as basic as a hospitalization or maternity services or, you know, the rest of this list. there may be things on the list would he disagree with. but i m worried we re headed to a choice tto one else in the industrialized world has to accept. i accept your goal and i hope we can work together to make it so. you mentioned we should listen to the governors, which brings me to my second question and your answer to senator portman. in colorado, you may have heard this. we have something called the accountable care collaborative that is a unique approach to medicaid. it connects members with coordinated primary care providers while reducing various taxes. it also provides coordinate care for those with dual eligibility for medicare and medicaid. i could show you the cost curve