Difference and what is delaying adoption of that one . It is easier to describe how why itke a describe than has been a problem so far. They make a difference because that can be put takeselectronic poll book care of a lot of sort of antiquated paper that is in a place. Much more l up information including signature i. D. And ion and photo cut down on traditional lane problems that have lane that have line problems. They are a low cost simple solution to putting a lot of paper in one place where poll t access it easily. How about the implementation . This goes into the morass we have fallen into with technology. Is that the roblem Certification Program for new systems is fatally broken. New systems are having a great difficulty coming onli online. Because the access it certifica takes so long and is virtually impossible to get some of the solutions are just proving very nettlesome manufacturers to find a market to put them in place. Highlightedaware is in your report as a national eade
We stole him from san jose at the tender age of i think 29 or 30 to come all the way to the National Association of environmental control. If i had half the energy of this guy, i would be president and Vice President. Hes an amazing guy. Very proud of the work that you do. Thank you for joining us today. Our second witness is from a bigger state than ours New Hampshire, and kelly ayotte cant with be us. Dr. Paul is it kirshen . Dr. Kirshen, Research Professor at the university of New Hampshire. What is your mascot there . Wildcats. Wildcats, yes. Weve had some rough football saturdays against the wildcats and the blue hens. Were all the happy to welcome you here. I understand your research focuses on engineering and management as well as Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment adaptation, planning. Its a mouth full but were happy you could join us. Thanks so much for coming. Lindene patton, my mother was a patton, chief climate product officer for Zurich International group. In this ro
The same answer, about racial profiling guidelines, and you say really soon were going to work on this. This year, i would like to ask you, how quickly an we expect new racial profiling guidelines when it relates to issues of religion, National Origin and whether it applies to National Security and Border Security cases . I dont want to repeat the words really soon given what you said so i will say that they are forthcoming and that in the holder lexicon, forthcoming is shorter than really soon. We are working with those there has been a review under way. We are, and i mean this sincerely, we are truly in the final stages of this, the proposal is just being circulated for comment within the department and my hope would be that it would be out the department very soon. Obviously theres some white house involvement because were talking about a 2003 executive order but i would hope that we would have an ability to talk about the modifications that i think are appropriate in a forthcoming
Challenge to the new Source Performance Standards since the passage of the 1977 amendments. Therefore, the court was rprised that Neither Party raised during the discussion below the appropriate standard of law in that discussion. They did not even mention the fact of a new major legislative effort. So even with the best kind of counsel it can happen. Issues spotting is a challenging business. Yes. Even with counsel and without it reliance on a judge is often hazardous. Ive never been a judge but ive litigated for a number of years and ive always been astonished at how cases that ive tried may raise issues on appeal that i thought were nsignificant and sometimes decided by a ruling without an opinion but i think that the reason i propose a constitutional advocate be involved in every decision that she or he thought was significant was to give the court the benefit of that kind of additional insight and guidance and perspective. Im going to turn to my colleague, senator grassley, and th
At stake for republicans voting in favor of it. The bill is essentially a clean suspension of the debt ceiling for about 13 months. What they are basically voting is if you are someone who in a republican primary contest, there are already arguments being made that republicans essentially voted in favor of giving a blank check for more government borrowing for a little more than the next year. It is the kind of thing that wont play well in republican primaries. Something thes republicans generally didnt want to have to vote for. They ultimately voted against it on the final passage. Observers of the senate know very well that this is not the where the final vote is the one that is really important. The vote that matters is the one with the 60 vote threshold. Which was, in this case,emanded by senator ted cruz the relative newcomer from texas that really wanted that threshold. Among the pieces you are writing, the worlds greatest blog, back toody that vote, you said the Democratic Leade